CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 13%CPEs: 54EXPL: 2CVE-2015-4147 – php: SoapClient's __call() type confusion through unserialize()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4147
The SoapClient::__call method in ext/soap/soap.c in PHP before 5.4.39, 5.5.x before 5.5.23, and 5.6.x before 5.6.7 does not verify that __default_headers is an array, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by providing crafted serialized data with an unexpected data type, related to a "type confusion" issue. El método SoapClient::__call en ext/soap/soap.c en PHP anterior a 5.4.39, 5.5.x anterior a 5.5.23, y 5.6.x anterior a 5.6.7 no verifica que __default_headers es un array, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario mediante la provisión de datos serializados manipulados con un tipo de datos no esperado, relacionado con un problema de 'confusión de tipo'. A flaws was discovered in the way PHP performed object unserialization. Specially crafted input processed by the unserialize() function could cause a PHP application to crash or, possibly, execute arbitrary code. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00005.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/01/4 http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1053.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1066.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1135.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1218.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics&# • CWE-19: Data Processing Errors CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 3%CPEs: 54EXPL: 3CVE-2015-4148 – SMF (Simple Machine Forum) 2.0.10 - Remote Memory Exfiltration
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4148
The do_soap_call function in ext/soap/soap.c in PHP before 5.4.39, 5.5.x before 5.5.23, and 5.6.x before 5.6.7 does not verify that the uri property is a string, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by providing crafted serialized data with an int data type, related to a "type confusion" issue. La función do_soap_call en ext/soap/soap.c en PHP anterior a 5.4.39, 5.5.x anterior a 5.5.23, y 5.6.x anterior a 5.6.7 no verifica que la propiedad uri es una cadena, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible mediante la provisión de datos serializados manipulados con un tipo de datos int, relacionados con un problema de 'confusión de tipo'. A flaws was discovered in the way PHP performed object unserialization. Specially crafted input processed by the unserialize() function could cause a PHP application to crash or, possibly, execute arbitrary code. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38304 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-06/msg00028.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/01/4 http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1053.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1066.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1135.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1218.html http&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 12%CPEs: 10EXPL: 4CVE-2015-1157
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1157
CoreText in Apple iOS 8.x through 8.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reboot and messaging disruption) via crafted Unicode text that is not properly handled during display truncation in the Notifications feature, as demonstrated by Arabic characters in (1) an SMS message or (2) a WhatsApp message. CoreText en Apple iOS 8.x hasta 8.3 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (reinicio y interrupción de mensaje) a través de texto Unicode manipulado que no se maneja correctamente durante la truncación de la pantalla en la característica Notifications, tal y como fue demostrado por caracteres arábigos en (1) un mensaje de SMS o (2) un mensaje de WhatsApp. • https://github.com/perillamint/CVE-2015-1157 http://9to5mac.com/2015/05/27/how-to-fix-ios-text-message-bug-crash-reboot http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00002.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00003.html http://support.apple.com/kb/HT204941 http://support.apple.com/kb/HT204942 http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/apple-ios-bug-sees-message-app-crash-iph • CWE-17: DEPRECATED: Code •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 3CVE-2014-8146 – ICU library 52 < 54 - Multiple Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8146
The resolveImplicitLevels function in common/ubidi.c in the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm implementation in ICU4C in International Components for Unicode (ICU) before 55.1 does not properly track directionally isolated pieces of text, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted text. La función resolveImplicitLevels en common/ubidi.c en la implementación Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm en ICU4C en International Components for Unicode (ICU) anterior a 55.1 no rastrea correctamente trozos de texto aislados direccionalmente, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria dinámica) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de texto manipulado. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43887 http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/changeset/37162 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00003.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00005.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00008.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/05/6 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/May/14 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •