CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 3CVE-2014-8146 – ICU library 52 < 54 - Multiple Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8146
The resolveImplicitLevels function in common/ubidi.c in the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm implementation in ICU4C in International Components for Unicode (ICU) before 55.1 does not properly track directionally isolated pieces of text, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted text. La función resolveImplicitLevels en common/ubidi.c en la implementación Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm en ICU4C en International Components for Unicode (ICU) anterior a 55.1 no rastrea correctamente trozos de texto aislados direccionalmente, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria dinámica) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de texto manipulado. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43887 http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/changeset/37162 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00003.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00005.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00008.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/05/6 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/May/14 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 3EXPL: 3CVE-2014-8147 – ICU library 52 < 54 - Multiple Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8147
The resolveImplicitLevels function in common/ubidi.c in the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm implementation in ICU4C in International Components for Unicode (ICU) before 55.1 uses an integer data type that is inconsistent with a header file, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (incorrect malloc followed by invalid free) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted text. La función resolveImplicitLevels en common/ubidi.c en la implementación Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm en ICU4C en International Components for Unicode (ICU) anterior a 55.1 utiliza un tipo de datos de enteros que es inconsistente con un fichero de cabeceras, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (malloc incorrecto seguido por liberación inválida) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de texto manipulado. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43887 http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/changeset/37080 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00005.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00008.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/05/6 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/May/14 http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3323 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/602540 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3153
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3153
The default configuration for cURL and libcurl before 7.42.1 sends custom HTTP headers to both the proxy and destination server, which might allow remote proxy servers to obtain sensitive information by reading the header contents. La configuración por defecto para cURL y libcurl anterior a 7.42.1 envía cabeceras HTTP personalizadas tanto al servidor proxy como al de destinación, lo que podría permitir a servidores proxy remotos obtener información sensible mediante la lectura de los contenidos de cabeceras. • http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20150429.html http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10743 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-05/msg00017.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3240 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2016-2867206.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpu • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3414 – sqlite: use of uninitialized memory when parsing collation sequences in src/where.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3414
SQLite before 3.8.9 does not properly implement the dequoting of collation-sequence names, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (uninitialized memory access and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted COLLATE clause, as demonstrated by COLLATE"""""""" at the end of a SELECT statement. SQLite anterior a 3.8.9 no implementa correctamente la descomillación de nombres de secuencias de colaciones, lo que permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto causar una denegación de servicio (acceso a memoria no inicializada y caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de una clausula COLLATE manipulada, tal y como fue demostrado por COLLATE'''''''' al final de una declaración SELECT. A flaw was found in the way SQLite handled dequoting of collation-sequence names. A local attacker could submit a specially crafted COLLATE statement that would crash the SQLite process, or have other unspecified impacts. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00005.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00008.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1635.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Apr/31 http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3252 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:217 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-295 • CWE-456: Missing Initialization of a Variable CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource •