CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 94%CPEs: 127EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5390 – Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5390
06 Aug 2018 — Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. El kernel de Linux en versiones 4.9 y siguientes pueden forzarse a realizar llamadas muy caras a tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() y tcp_prune_ofo_queue() para cada paquete entrante, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. A flaw named SegmentSmack was found in the way the Linux kernel handled specially crafted TCP pac... • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5543
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5543
31 Jul 2018 — The F5 BIG-IP Controller for Kubernetes 1.0.0-1.5.0 (k8s-bigip-crtl) passes BIG-IP username and password as command line parameters, which may lead to disclosure of the credentials used by the container. F5 BIG-IP Controller for Kubernetes 1.0.0-1.5.0 (k8s-bigip-crtl) pasa el nombre de usuario y la contraseña de BIG-IP como parámetros de la línea de comandos, lo que podría conducir a la divulgación de las credenciales empleadas por el contenedor. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104944 • CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5531
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5531
25 Jul 2018 — Through undisclosed methods, on F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.2.1-11.5.6, adjacent network attackers can cause a denial of service for VCMP guest and host systems. Attack must be sourced from adjacent network (layer 2). Mediante métodos sin revelar, en on F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1 o 11.2.1-11.5.6, los atacantes de red adyacentes pueden provocar una denegación de servicio (DoS) para los sistemas invitado y host VCMP. El ataque debe origin... • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K64721111 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5538
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5538
25 Jul 2018 — On F5 BIG-IP DNS 13.1.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.3-12.1.3.5, DNS Express / DNS Zones accept NOTIFY messages on the management interface from source IP addresses not listed in the 'Allow NOTIFY From' configuration parameter when the db variable "dnsexpress.notifyport" is set to any value other than the default of "0". En F5 BIG-IP DNS 13.1.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.3-12.1.3.5, DNS Express / DNS Zones aceptan mensajes NOTIFY en la interfaz de gestión desde las direcciones IP de origen que no están listadas en el parámetro de co... • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K45435121 •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5542
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5542
25 Jul 2018 — F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.0.1, 12.1.0-12.1.3.6, or 11.2.1-11.6.3.2 HTTPS health monitors do not validate the identity of the monitored server. Los monitores de salud HTTPS F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.0.1, 12.1.0-12.1.3.6 o 11.2.1-11.6.3.2 no validan la identidad del servidor monitorizado. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K05112543 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5532
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5532
19 Jul 2018 — On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.2.1-11.5.6 a domain name cached within the DNS Cache of TMM may continue to be resolved by the cache even after the parent server revokes the record, if the DNS Cache is receiving a stream of requests for the cached name. En F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1 o 11.2.1-11.5.6, un nombre de dominio cacheado con la DNS Cache de TMM podría ser resuelto por la caché incluso después de que el servidor padre revoque el registro, siempre y cua... • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041345 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5533
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5533
19 Jul 2018 — Under certain conditions on F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.5.0-11.5.6, TMM may core while processing SSL forward proxy traffic. Bajo ciertas condiciones en F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1 o 11.5.0-11.5.6, TMM podría realizar un "core" al procesar tráfico SSL forward proxy. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041342 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5534
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5534
19 Jul 2018 — Under certain conditions on F5 BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.0.5, 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.5.0-11.5.6, TMM may core while processing SSL forward proxy traffic. Bajo ciertas condiciones en F5 BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.0.5, 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1 o 11.5.0-11.5.6, TMM podría realizar un "core" al procesar tráfico SSL forward proxy. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041343 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5535
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5535
19 Jul 2018 — On F5 BIG-IP 14.0.0, 13.0.0-13.1.0, 12.1.0-12.1.3, or 11.5.1-11.6.3 specifically crafted HTTP responses, when processed by a Virtual Server with an associated QoE profile that has Video enabled, may cause TMM to incorrectly buffer response data causing the TMM to restart resulting in a Denial of Service. En F5 BIG-IP 14.0.0, 13.0.0-13.1.0, 12.1.0-12.1.3 o 11.5.1-11.6.3, las respuestas HTTP específicamente manipuladas, al ser procesadas por un servidor virtual con un perfil QoE asociado que tiene el vídeo ha... • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041344 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 92EXPL: 1CVE-2018-13405 – Linux (Ubuntu) - Other Users coredumps Can Be Read via setgid Directory and killpriv Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-13405
06 Jul 2018 — The inode_init_owner function in fs/inode.c in the Linux kernel through 3.16 allows local users to create files with an unintended group ownership, in a scenario where a directory is SGID to a certain group and is writable by a user who is not a member of that group. Here, the non-member can trigger creation of a plain file whose group ownership is that group. The intended behavior was that the non-member can trigger creation of a directory (but not a plain file) whose group ownership is that group. The non... • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45033 • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management CWE-284: Improper Access Control •