CVE-2015-8391 – pcre: inefficient posix character class syntax check (8.38/16)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8391
The pcre_compile function in pcre_compile.c in PCRE before 8.38 mishandles certain [: nesting, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror. La función pcre_compile en pcre_compile.c en PCRE en versiones anteriores a 8.38 no maneja correctamente cierta anidación [: , lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de CPU) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de una expresión regular manipulada, según lo demostrado por un objeto JavaScript RegExp encontrado por Konqueror. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/174931.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1025.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2750.html http://vcs.pcre.org/pcre/code/trunk/ChangeLog?view=markup http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T1023886 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/29/1 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/82990 https: • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity •
CVE-2015-8394
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8394
PCRE before 8.38 mishandles the (?(<digits>) and (?(R<digits>) conditions, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror. PCRE en versiones anteriores a 8.38 no maneja correctamente las condiciones (?() y (? • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/174931.html http://vcs.pcre.org/pcre/code/trunk/ChangeLog?view=markup http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/29/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/82990 https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa128 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05240731 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201607-02 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230216-0002 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVE-2006-3017
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-3017
zend_hash_del_key_or_index in zend_hash.c in PHP before 4.4.3 and 5.x before 5.1.3 can cause zend_hash_del to delete the wrong element, which prevents a variable from being unset even when the PHP unset function is called, which might cause the variable's value to be used in security-relevant operations. • ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20060701-01-U http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2006-08/0166.html http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/Zend/zend_hash.c?hideattic=0&r1=1.87.4.8.2.1&r2=1.87.4.8.2.2 http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/Zend/zend_hash.c?hideattic=0&view=log http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0549.html http://secunia.com/advisories/19927 http://secunia.com/advisories/21031 http://secunia.com/advisories/21050 •