Page 32 of 426 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 8.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

The Broadcom brcmfmac WiFi driver prior to commit a4176ec356c73a46c07c181c6d04039fafa34a9f is vulnerable to a frame validation bypass. If the brcmfmac driver receives a firmware event frame from a remote source, the is_wlc_event_frame function will cause this frame to be discarded and unprocessed. If the driver receives the firmware event frame from the host, the appropriate handler is called. This frame validation can be bypassed if the bus used is USB (for instance by a wifi dongle). This can allow firmware event frames from a remote source to be processed. • https://blog.quarkslab.com/reverse-engineering-broadcom-wireless-chipsets.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701842 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132828 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a4176ec356c73a46c07c181c6d04039fafa34a9f https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/166939 https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2019/CVE-2019-9503.html https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-9503 https://access.redhat.com&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0

An infinite loop issue was found in the vhost_net kernel module in Linux Kernel up to and including v5.1-rc6, while handling incoming packets in handle_rx(). It could occur if one end sends packets faster than the other end can process them. A guest user, maybe remote one, could use this flaw to stall the vhost_net kernel thread, resulting in a DoS scenario. Se encontró un problema de bucle infinito en el módulo del núcleo vhost_net en el kernel de Linux versiones anteriores a 5.1-rc6 inclusive, mientras manejaba los paquetes entrantes en handle_rx(). Puede ocurrir cuando un extremo envía los paquetes más rápido de lo que el otro extremo los procesa. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155212/Slackware-Security-Advisory-Slackware-14.2-kernel-Updates.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108076 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1973 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2029 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2043 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3220 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3309 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3517 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3836 http • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 1

A heap address information leak while using L2CAP_GET_CONF_OPT was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.1-rc1. Se descubrió una fuga de información de direcciones en memoria dinámica mientras se usaba L2CAP_GET_CONF_OPT en el kernel de Linux anterior a 5.1-rc1. A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's implementation of Logical Link Control and Adaptation Protocol (L2CAP), part of the Bluetooth stack. An attacker, within the range of standard Bluetooth transmissions, can create and send a specially crafted packet. The response to this specially crafted packet can contain part of the kernel stack which can be used in a further attack. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/27/7 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/08/12/1 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2029 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2043 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3309 https://access.redhat. • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0

Lack of correct bounds checking in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page. La falta de comprobación de límites correcta en Skia en Google Chrome antes de la versión 73.0.3683.75, permitió que un atacante remoto ejecutara una lectura de memoria fuera de límites por medio de una página HTML creada. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00029.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00084.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00085.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1308 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1309 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1310 https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2019/03/stable-ch • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0

If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •