CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3416 – sqlite: stack buffer overflow in src/printf.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3416
The sqlite3VXPrintf function in printf.c in SQLite before 3.8.9 does not properly handle precision and width values during floating-point conversions, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and stack-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via large integers in a crafted printf function call in a SELECT statement. La función sqlite3VXPrintf en printf.c en SQLite anterior a 3.8.9 no maneja correctamente los valores de precisión y anchura durante las conversaciones de puntos flotantes (floating-point), lo que permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto causar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de enteros y desbordamiento de buffer basado en pila) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de enteros grandes en una llamada a la función printf manipulada en una declaración SELECT. It was found that SQLite's sqlite3VXPrintf() function did not properly handle precision and width values during floating-point conversions. A local attacker could submit a specially crafted SELECT statement that would crash the SQLite process, or have other unspecified impacts. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00005.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00008.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1634.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1635.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Apr/31 http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3252 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:217 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http:/&#x • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3415 – sqlite: invalid free() in src/vdbe.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3415
The sqlite3VdbeExec function in vdbe.c in SQLite before 3.8.9 does not properly implement comparison operators, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid free operation) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted CHECK clause, as demonstrated by CHECK(0&O>O) in a CREATE TABLE statement. La función sqlite3VdbeExec en vdbe.c en SQLite anterior a 3.8.9 no implementa correctamente los operadores de comparaciones, lo que permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto causar una denegación de servicio (operación de liberación inválida) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de una clausula CHECK manipulada, tal y como fue demostrado por CHECK(0&O>O) en una declaración CREATE TABLE. It was found that SQLite's sqlite3VdbeExec() function did not properly implement comparison operators. A local attacker could submit a specially crafted CHECK statement that would crash the SQLite process, or have other unspecified impacts. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00005.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00008.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1635.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Apr/31 http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3252 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:217 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-295 • CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3414 – sqlite: use of uninitialized memory when parsing collation sequences in src/where.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3414
SQLite before 3.8.9 does not properly implement the dequoting of collation-sequence names, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (uninitialized memory access and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted COLLATE clause, as demonstrated by COLLATE"""""""" at the end of a SELECT statement. SQLite anterior a 3.8.9 no implementa correctamente la descomillación de nombres de secuencias de colaciones, lo que permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto causar una denegación de servicio (acceso a memoria no inicializada y caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de una clausula COLLATE manipulada, tal y como fue demostrado por COLLATE'''''''' al final de una declaración SELECT. A flaw was found in the way SQLite handled dequoting of collation-sequence names. A local attacker could submit a specially crafted COLLATE statement that would crash the SQLite process, or have other unspecified impacts. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00005.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00008.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1635.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Apr/31 http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3252 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:217 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-295 • CWE-456: Missing Initialization of a Variable CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 159EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3148 – curl: Negotiate not treated as connection-oriented
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3148
cURL and libcurl 7.10.6 through 7.41.0 do not properly re-use authenticated Negotiate connections, which allows remote attackers to connect as other users via a request. cURL y libcurl 7.10.6 hasta la versión 7.41.0 no reutiliza adecuadamente la conexiones Negotiate autenticadas, lo que permite a atacantes remotos conectarse como otros usuarios a través de una solicitud. It was discovered that libcurl could incorrectly reuse Negotiate authenticated HTTP connections for subsequent requests. If an application using libcurl established a Negotiate authenticated HTTP connection to a server and sent subsequent requests with different credentials, the connection could be re-used with the initial set of credentials instead of using the new ones. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2015-0179.html http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20150422B.html http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10743 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155957.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/156250.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/156945.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 88%CPEs: 41EXPL: 1CVE-2015-3145
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3145
The sanitize_cookie_path function in cURL and libcurl 7.31.0 through 7.41.0 does not properly calculate an index, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and crash) or possibly have other unspecified impact via a cookie path containing only a double-quote character. La función sanitize_cookie_path en cURL y libcurl 7.31.0 hasta 7.41.0 no calcula correctamente un indice, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (escritura fuera de rango y caída) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de una ruta de cookie que contiene solamente un carácter de comillas dobles. • https://github.com/serz999/CVE-2015-3145 http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2015-0179.html http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20150422C.html http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10743 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155957.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/156250.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May& • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •