CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 1%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3598 – Oracle Java MethodHandles dropArguments Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3598
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u92 and Java SE Embedded 8u91 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3610. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 8u92 y Java SE Embedded 8u91 permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, la integridad y la disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con Libraries, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2016-3610. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of MethodHandles' dropArguments method. Due to unsafe handling of reflection of privileged classes inside the MethodHandles class, it is possible for untrusted code to gain access to privileged methods and properties. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00033.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00034.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09 •
CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 1%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3606 – Oracle Java Uninitialized Object Generation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3606
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u101 and 8u92 and Java SE Embedded 8u91 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Hotspot. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 7u101 y 8u92 y Java SE Embedded 8u91 permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, la integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con Hotspot. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the way the runtime evaluates uninitialized objects that are not compiler generated. Due to unsafe handling of privileged classes within the uninitialized objects, it is possible for untrusted code to gain access to privileged methods and properties. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00033.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00034.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00028. •
CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 1%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3610 – Oracle Java MethodHandles filterReturnValue Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3610
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u92 and Java SE Embedded 8u91 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3598. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 8u92 y Java SE Embedded 8u91 permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, la integridad y la disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con Libraries, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2016-3598. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of MethodHandles.filterReturnValue. Due to unsafe handling of reflection of privileged classes inside the MethodHandles class, it is possible for untrusted code to gain access to privileged methods and properties. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00033.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00034.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00028. •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 17%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5387 – HTTPD: sets environmental variable based on user supplied Proxy request header
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5387
The Apache HTTP Server through 2.4.23 follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "This mitigation has been assigned the identifier CVE-2016-5387"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. El Apache HTTP Server hasta la versión 2.4.23 sigue a RFC 3875 sección 4.1.18 y por lo tanto no protege aplicaciones de la presencia de datos de clientes no confiables en ambiente variable de HTTP_PROXY, lo que puede permitir a atacantes remotos redireccionar el tráfico HTTP saliente de aplicación a un servidor proxy arbitrario a través de una cabecera Proxy manipulada en una petición HTTP, también conocido como problema "httpoxy". NOTA: el vendedor afirma "Se ha asignado a esta mitigación el identificador CVE-2016-5387"; en otras palabras, esto no es un CVE ID para una vulnerabilidad. It was discovered that httpd used the value of the Proxy header from HTTP requests to initialize the HTTP_PROXY environment variable for CGI scripts, which in turn was incorrectly used by certain HTTP client implementations to configure the proxy for outgoing HTTP requests. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-07/msg00059.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1624.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1625.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1648.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1649.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3623 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1CVE-2016-6170
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-6170
ISC BIND through 9.9.9-P1, 9.10.x through 9.10.4-P1, and 9.11.x through 9.11.0b1 allows primary DNS servers to cause a denial of service (secondary DNS server crash) via a large AXFR response, and possibly allows IXFR servers to cause a denial of service (IXFR client crash) via a large IXFR response and allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (primary DNS server crash) via a large UPDATE message. ISC BIND hasta la versión 9.9.9-P1, 9.10.x hasta la versión 9.10.4-P1 y 9.11.x hasta la versión 9.11.0b1 permite a servidores DNS primarios provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de servidor DNS secundario) a través de una respuesta AXFR grande, y posiblemente permite a servidores IXFR provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de cliente IXFR) a través de una respuesta IXFR grande y permite a usuarios remotos autenticados provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de servidor DNS primario) a través de un mensaje UPDATE grande. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/06/3 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91611 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036241 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353563 https://github.com/sischkg/xfer-limit/blob/master/README.md https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01390 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01390/169/CVE-2016-6170 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2016-July/015058.html https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •