Page 34 of 174 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.1 before 7.1(2)49 and 7.2 before 7.2(2)17 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via unknown vectors related to VPN connection termination and password expiry. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y PIX 7.1 anterior a 7.1(2)49 y 7.2 anterior a 7.2(2)17 permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (recarga de dispositivo) a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con el fin de la conexión VPN y el vencimiento de la contraseña. • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080833166.shtml http://www.osvdb.org/35332 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23768 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1636 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34021 •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

Race condition in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.1 before 7.1(2)49 and 7.2 before 7.2(2)19, when using "clientless SSL VPNs," allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via "non-standard SSL sessions." Condición de carrera en el Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y en el PIX 7.1 anterior al 7.1(2)49 y el 7.2 anterior al 7.2(2)19, cuando se utiliza "VPNs SSL sin cliente", permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (recargar el dispositivo) a través de "sesiones SSL no estándar". • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080833166.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/337508 http://www.osvdb.org/35333 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23768 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1636 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34023 •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 18%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.2 before 7.2(2)8, when using Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) or Remote Management Access, allows remote attackers to bypass LDAP authentication and gain privileges via unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y PIX 7.2 before 7.2(2)8, cuando utilizan Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) o Remote Management Access, permite a atacantes remotos evitar la validación LDAP y ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080833166.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/210876 http://www.osvdb.org/35331 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23768 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017994 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017995 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1636 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34020 •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The DHCP relay agent in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (dropped packets) via a DHCPREQUEST or DHCPINFORM message that causes multiple DHCPACK messages to be sent from DHCP servers to the agent, which consumes the memory allocated for a local buffer. NOTE: this issue only occurs when multiple DHCP servers are used. El agente transmisor DHCP en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y PIX 7.2 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (abandono de paquetes) mediante un mensaje DHCPREQUEST o DHCPINFORM que provoca que múltiples mensajes DHCPACK sean enviados desde servidores DHCP al agente, lo cual consume la memoria reservada para un búfer local. NOTA: esta situación sólo se da cuando se usan múltiples servidores DHCP. • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080833172.html http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/530057 http://www.osvdb.org/35330 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23763 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017999 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018000 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1635 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34026 •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 5%CPEs: 138EXPL: 0

Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected. Protocolo Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1, implementado para Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, y PIX firewalls, permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (agotamiento de recursos) a través de un flood de paquetes IKE Phase-1 que exceden el ratio de expiración de la sesión. NOTA: se ha indicado que esto es debido a un diseño debil del protocolo IKe version 1, en cuyo caso otros vendedores e implementaciones podrían verse afectados. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-07/0531.html http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1293 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016582 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/tsd_technology_security_response09186a00806f33d4.html http://www.nta-monitor.com/posts/2006/07/cisco-concentrator-dos.html http://www.osvdb.org/29068 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/441203/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19176 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities& •