CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5403 – Qemu: virtio: unbounded memory allocation on host via guest leading to DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5403
The virtqueue_pop function in hw/virtio/virtio.c in QEMU allows local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and QEMU process crash) by submitting requests without waiting for completion. La función virtqueue_pop en hw/virtio/virtio.c en QEMU permite a administradores locales del SO invitado provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria y caida del proceso QUEMU) mediante la presentación de solicitudes sin esperar la finalización. Quick Emulator (QEMU) built with the virtio framework is vulnerable to an unbounded memory allocation issue. It was found that a malicious guest user could submit more requests than the virtqueue size permits. Processing a request allocates a VirtQueueElement results in unbounded memory allocation on the host controlled by the guest. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1585.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1586.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1606.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1607.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1652.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1653.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1654.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1655.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1756.html http://rhn • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 91%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2775 – bind: Too long query name causes segmentation fault in lwresd
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2775
ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.9-P2, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P2, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0b2, when lwresd or the named lwres option is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a long request that uses the lightweight resolver protocol. ISC BIND 9.x en versiones anteriores a 9.9.9-P2, 9.10.x en versiones anteriores a 9.10.4-P2 y 9.11.x en versiones anteriores a 9.11.0b2, cuando lwresd o la opción nombrada lwres está habilitada, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del demonio) a través de una petición larga que utiliza el protocolo ligero de resolución. It was found that the lightweight resolver protocol implementation in BIND could enter an infinite recursion and crash when asked to resolve a query name which, when combined with a search list entry, exceeds the maximum allowable length. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash lwresd or named when using the "lwres" statement in named.conf. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92037 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036360 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:0651 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1767 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2533 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05321107 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01393/74/CVE-2016-2775 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01435 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01436 https://kb.isc.org&#x • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 17%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5387 – HTTPD: sets environmental variable based on user supplied Proxy request header
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5387
The Apache HTTP Server through 2.4.23 follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "This mitigation has been assigned the identifier CVE-2016-5387"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. El Apache HTTP Server hasta la versión 2.4.23 sigue a RFC 3875 sección 4.1.18 y por lo tanto no protege aplicaciones de la presencia de datos de clientes no confiables en ambiente variable de HTTP_PROXY, lo que puede permitir a atacantes remotos redireccionar el tráfico HTTP saliente de aplicación a un servidor proxy arbitrario a través de una cabecera Proxy manipulada en una petición HTTP, también conocido como problema "httpoxy". NOTA: el vendedor afirma "Se ha asignado a esta mitigación el identificador CVE-2016-5387"; en otras palabras, esto no es un CVE ID para una vulnerabilidad. It was discovered that httpd used the value of the Proxy header from HTTP requests to initialize the HTTP_PROXY environment variable for CGI scripts, which in turn was incorrectly used by certain HTTP client implementations to configure the proxy for outgoing HTTP requests. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-07/msg00059.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1624.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1625.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1648.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1649.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3623 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2015-8896 – ImageMagick: Integer truncation vulnerability in coders/pict.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8896
Integer truncation issue in coders/pict.c in ImageMagick before 7.0.5-0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted .pict file. Problema de truncamiento de entero en coders/pict.c en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 7.0.5-0 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de la aplicación) a través de un archivo .pict manipulado. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/07/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/08/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/02/13 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91027 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1237 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1448803 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/0f6fc2d5bf8f500820c3dbcf0d23ee14 •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5126 – Qemu: block: iscsi: buffer overflow in iscsi_aio_ioctl
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5126
Heap-based buffer overflow in the iscsi_aio_ioctl function in block/iscsi.c in QEMU allows local guest OS users to cause a denial of service (QEMU process crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted iSCSI asynchronous I/O ioctl call. Desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria dinámica en la función iscsi_aio_ioctl en block/iscsi.c en QEMU permite a usuarios locales del SO invitado provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del proceso QEMU) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una llamada iSCSI ioctl I/O asíncrona manipulada. Quick Emulator(QEMU) built with the Block driver for iSCSI images support (virtio-blk) is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow issue. The flaw could occur while processing iSCSI asynchronous I/O ioctl(2) calls. A user inside a guest could exploit this flaw to crash the QEMU process resulting in denial of service, or potentially leverage it to execute arbitrary code with QEMU-process privileges on the host. • http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=a6b3167fa0e825aebb5a7cd8b437b6d41584a196 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1606.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1607.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1653.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1654.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1655.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1756.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1763.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-secu • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •