CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 264EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6675
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6675
BIG-IP configurations using Active Directory, LDAP, or Client Certificate LDAP for management authentication with multiple servers are exposed to a vulnerability which allows an authentication bypass. This can result in a complete compromise of the system. This issue only impacts specific engineering hotfixes using the aforementioned authentication configuration. NOTE: This vulnerability does not affect any of the BIG-IP major, minor or maintenance releases you obtained from downloads.f5.com. The affected Engineering Hotfix builds are as follows: Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.3.0.79.6-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.3.0.97.6-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.3.0.99.6-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.5.0.15.5-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.5.0.36.5-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.5.0.40.5-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.6.0.11.9-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.6.0.14.9-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.6.0.68.9-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.6.0.70.9-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.0.11.37-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.0.18.37-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.0.32.37-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.46.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.14.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.16.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.34.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.97.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.99.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.105.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.111.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.115.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.122.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-15.0.1.0.33.11-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-15.0.1.0.48.11-ENG.iso Las configuraciones BIG-IP que utilizan Active Directory, LDAP o Client Certificate LDAP para la autenticación de administración con varios servidores están expuestas a una vulnerabilidad que permite una omisión de identificación. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K55655944 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K55655944?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 81EXPL: 2CVE-2019-10744 – nodejs-lodash: prototype pollution in defaultsDeep function leading to modifying properties
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10744
Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. Las versiones de lodash inferiores a 4.17.12, son vulnerables a la Contaminación de Prototipo. La función defaultsDeep podría ser engañada para agregar o modificar las propiedades de Object.prototype usando una carga útil de constructor. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in lodash. • https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-10744 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3024 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191004-0005 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASH-450202 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K47105354?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10744 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 96EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11479 – kernel: tcp: excessive resource consumption for TCP connections with low MSS allows remote denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11479
Jonathan Looney discovered that the Linux kernel default MSS is hard-coded to 48 bytes. This allows a remote peer to fragment TCP resend queues significantly more than if a larger MSS were enforced. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commits 967c05aee439e6e5d7d805e195b3a20ef5c433d6 and 5f3e2bf008c2221478101ee72f5cb4654b9fc363. Jonathan Looney descubrió que el tamaño máximo de segmento (MSS) por defecto del kernel de Linux está codificado a 48 bytes. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108818 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1594 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1602 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1699 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabili • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 84EXPL: 0CVE-2019-12295
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-12295
In Wireshark 3.0.0 to 3.0.1, 2.6.0 to 2.6.8, and 2.4.0 to 2.4.14, the dissection engine could crash. This was addressed in epan/packet.c by restricting the number of layers and consequently limiting recursion. En Wireshark versión 3.0.0 a 3.0.1, versión 2.6.0 a 2.6.8 y versión 2.4.0 a 2.4.14, el motor de disección podría fallar. Esto fue direccionado en epan/packet.c por la restricción del número de capas y por consiguiente limitando la recursión. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108464 https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15778 https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=7b6e197da4c497e229ed3ebf6952bae5c426a820 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/10/msg00036.html https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06725231 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06725231?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://usn.ubuntu.com/4133-1 https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2019-19.html • CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •