CVE-1999-1517
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-1999-1517
runtar in the Amanda backup system used in various UNIX operating systems executes tar with root privileges, which allows a user to overwrite or read arbitrary files by providing the target files to runtar. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=94148942818975&w=2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/750 •
CVE-1999-0912 – FreeBSD 3.0/3.1/3.2 - 'vfs_cache' Denial of Service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-1999-0912
FreeBSD VFS cache (vfs_cache) allows local users to cause a denial of service by opening a large number of files. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/19505 http://www.osvdb.org/1079 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/653 •
CVE-1999-0704 – BSD/OS 3.1/4.0.1 / FreeBSD 3.0/3.1/3.2 / RedHat Linux 6.0 - 'amd' Remote Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-1999-0704
Buffer overflow in Berkeley automounter daemon (amd) logging facility provided in the Linux am-utils package and others. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/19478 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/19479 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/614 •
CVE-2000-0489 – FreeBSD 5.0 / NetBSD 1.4.2 / OpenBSD 2.7 - 'setsockopt()' Denial of Service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-0489
FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD allow an attacker to cause a denial of service by creating a large number of socket pairs using the socketpair function, setting a large buffer size via setsockopt, then writing large buffers. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/19488 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/622 http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1&msg=NCBBKFKDOLAGKIAPMILPCEJLCEAA.labs%40ussrback.com http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1&msg=Pine.LNX.4.10.9908270039010.16315-100000%40thetis.deor.org https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/3298 •
CVE-1999-1564
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-1999-1564
FreeBSD 3.2 and possibly other versions allows a local user to cause a denial of service (panic) with a large number accesses of an NFS v3 mounted directory from a large number of processes. • http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/26166 •