CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2010-1689
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-1689
The DNS implementation in smtpsvc.dll before 6.0.2600.5949 in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4 and earlier, Windows XP SP3 and earlier, Windows Server 2003 SP2 and earlier, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and earlier, Windows Server 2008 R2, Exchange Server 2003 SP3 and earlier, Exchange Server 2007 SP2 and earlier, and Exchange Server 2010 uses predictable transaction IDs that are formed by incrementing a previous ID by 1, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof DNS responses, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0024 and CVE-2010-0025. La implementación DNS en smtpsvc.dll anteriores a v6.0.2600.5949 en Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4 y anteriores, Windows XP SP3 y anteriores, Windows Server 2003 SP2 y anteriores, Windows Server 2008 SP2 y anteriores , Windows Server 2008 R2, Exchange Server 2003 SP3 y anteriores, Exchange Server 2007 SP2 y anteriores, y Exchange Server 2010 usa IDs de transacción predecibles que se pueden obtener de sumar 1 a la anterior, lo que provoca que sea fácil que un atacante capture respuestas DNS mediante un ataque "hombre-en-medio" (man-in-the-middle), es una vulnerabilidad distinta a CVE-2010-0024 and CVE-2010-0025. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-05/0058.html http://securitytracker.com/id?1023939 http://www.coresecurity.com/content/CORE-2010-0424-windows-smtp-dns-query-id-bugs http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/39908 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 51%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2010-1690
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-1690
The DNS implementation in smtpsvc.dll before 6.0.2600.5949 in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4 and earlier, Windows XP SP3 and earlier, Windows Server 2003 SP2 and earlier, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and earlier, Windows Server 2008 R2, Exchange Server 2003 SP3 and earlier, Exchange Server 2007 SP2 and earlier, and Exchange Server 2010 does not verify that transaction IDs of responses match transaction IDs of queries, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof DNS responses, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0024 and CVE-2010-0025. La implementación DNS en smtpsvc.dll anteriores a v6.0.2600.5949 en Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4 y anteriores, Windows XP SP3 y anteriores, Windows Server 2003 SP2 y anteriores, Windows Server 2008 SP2 y anteriores , Windows Server 2008 R2, Exchange Server 2003 SP3 y anteriores, Exchange Server 2007 SP2 y anteriores, y Exchange Server 2010 no verifican que IDs de transacción de respuestas, coinciden con con las IDs de las peticiones, lo que provoca que sea fácil que un atacante capture respuestas DNS mediante un ataque "hombre-en-medio" (man-in-the-middle), es una vulnerabilidad distinta a CVE-2010-0024 and CVE-2010-0025. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-05/0058.html http://securitytracker.com/id?1023939 http://www.coresecurity.com/content/CORE-2010-0424-windows-smtp-dns-query-id-bugs http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/39910 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 15%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2010-0025
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0025
The SMTP component in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, and Server 2008 Gold, SP2, and R2, and Exchange Server 2000 SP3, does not properly allocate memory for SMTP command replies, which allows remote attackers to read fragments of e-mail messages by sending a series of invalid commands and then sending a STARTTLS command, aka "SMTP Memory Allocation Vulnerability." El componente SMTP en Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 y SP3, Server 2003 SP2, y Server 2008 Gold, SP2, y R2, y Exchange Server 2000 SP3, no asigna adecuadamente memoria para las replicas de comando SMTP, lo que permite a atacantes remotos leer fragmentos de mensajes e-mail por envío de una serio de comandos inválidos y luego enviando un comando STARTTLS, conocido también como "Vulnerabilidad de asignación de memoria SMTP." • http://secunia.com/advisories/39253 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-103A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-024 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12175 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2010-0024
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0024
The SMTP component in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, and Server 2008 Gold, SP2, and R2, and Exchange Server 2003 SP2, does not properly parse MX records, which allows remote DNS servers to cause a denial of service (service outage) via a crafted response to a DNS MX record query, aka "SMTP Server MX Record Vulnerability." El componente SMTP en Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 y SP3, Server 2003 SP2, y Server 2008 Gold, SP2, y R2, y Exchange Server 2000 SP3, no valida adecuadamente los registros MX, lo que permite a servidores DNS remotos causar una denegación de servicio (apagado de servicio)a través de respuestas manipuladas en una petición de registro MX, también conocido como "Vulnerabilidad de registro MX en servidor SMTP" • http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-103A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-024 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7067 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 1CVE-2009-1491
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-1491
McAfee GroupShield for Microsoft Exchange on Exchange Server 2000, and possibly other anti-virus or anti-spam products from McAfee or other vendors, does not scan X- headers for malicious content, which allows remote attackers to bypass virus detection via a crafted message, as demonstrated by a message with an X-Testing header and no message body. McAfee GroupShield para Microsoft Exchange en Exchange Server 2000, y posiblemente otros productos antivirus y antispam de McAfee y otros vendedores, no escanea las cabeceras X- de los contenidos maliciosos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos evitar la detección vírica a través de un mensaje manipulado, como se ha demostrado con un mensaje con una cabecera X- de prueba y sin cuerpo de mensaje. • http://www.nmrc.org/~thegnome/blog/apr09 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50354 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •