Page 36 of 205 results (0.024 seconds)

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 36EXPL: 0

The inflateMark function in inflate.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving left shifts of negative integers. La función inflateMark en inflate.c en zlib 1.2.8 podría permitir que los atacantes dependientes del contexto tener un impacto no especificado a través de vectores que implican cambios a la izquierda de enteros negativos. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00127.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00050.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00053.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/05/21 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95131 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039427 https:/&# •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 67%CPEs: 81EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; and JRockit R28.3.9 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to JMX. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99 y 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; y JRockit R28.3.9 permite a atacantes remotos afectar a la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con JMX. It was discovered that the RMI server implementation in the JMX component in OpenJDK did not restrict which classes can be deserialized when deserializing authentication credentials. A remote, unauthenticated attacker able to connect to a JMX port could possibly use this flaw to trigger deserialization flaws. Oracle Java SE and JRockit contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Java Management Extensions (JMX). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 62EXPL: 0

Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) png_set_PLTE and (2) png_get_PLTE functions in libpng before 1.0.64, 1.1.x and 1.2.x before 1.2.54, 1.3.x and 1.4.x before 1.4.17, 1.5.x before 1.5.24, and 1.6.x before 1.6.19 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a small bit-depth value in an IHDR (aka image header) chunk in a PNG image. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer en las funciones (1) png_set_PLTE y (2) png_get_PLTE en libpng en versiones anteriores a 1.0.64, 1.1.x y 1.2.x en versiones anteriores a 1.2.54, 1.3.x y 1.4.x en versiones anteriores a 1.4.17, 1.5.x en versiones anteriores a 1.5.24 y 1.6.x en versiones anteriores a 1.6.19 permiten a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de un valor bit-depth pequeño en un fragmento IHDR (también conocido como image header) en una imagen PNG. It was discovered that the png_get_PLTE() and png_set_PLTE() functions of libpng did not correctly calculate the maximum palette sizes for bit depths of less than 8. In case an application tried to use these functions in combination with properly calculated palette sizes, this could lead to a buffer overflow or out-of-bounds reads. An attacker could exploit this to cause a crash or potentially execute arbitrary code by tricking an unsuspecting user into processing a specially crafted PNG image. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/03/stable-channel-update.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172324.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172620.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172647.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172663.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u75, 6u85, 7u72, and 8u25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to RMI. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 5.0u75, 6u85, 7u72, y 8u25 permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, la integridad y la disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con RMI. An improper permission check issue was discovered in the RMI component in OpenJDK. An untrusted Java application or applet could use these flaws to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. • http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04583581 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-02/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-02/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00018.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142496355704097&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142607790919348&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0068.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA& •