Page 36 of 929 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 1

In KDE Frameworks KConfig before 5.61.0, malicious desktop files and configuration files lead to code execution with minimal user interaction. This relates to libKF5ConfigCore.so, and the mishandling of .desktop and .directory files, as demonstrated by a shell command on an Icon line in a .desktop file. En KDE Frameworks KConfig en versiones anteriores a 5.61.0, los archivos de escritorio y los archivos de configuración maliciosos conllevan a la ejecución de código con una interacción mínima del usuario. Esto se relaciona con el archivo libKF5ConfigCore.so y el manejo inapropiado de archivos .desktop y .directory, como es demostrado por un comando de shell en una línea Icon en un archivo .desktop. A flaw was found in the KDE Frameworks KConfig prior to version 5.61.0. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00016.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00034.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153981/Slackware-Security-Advisory-kdelibs-Updates.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2606 https://gist.githubusercontent.com/zeropwn/630832df151029cb8f22d5b6b9efaefb/raw/64aa3d30279acb207f787ce9c135eefd5e52643b/kde-kdesktopfile-command-injection.txt https://lists.deb • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-454: External Initialization of Trusted Variables or Data Stores •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0

The JPXStream::init function in Poppler 0.78.0 and earlier doesn't check for negative values of stream length, leading to an Integer Overflow, thereby making it possible to allocate a large memory chunk on the heap, with a size controlled by an attacker, as demonstrated by pdftocairo. La función JPXStream::init en Poppler versión 0.78.0 y anteriores, no comprueba los valores negativos de la longitud de la transmisión, lo que conlleva a un Desbordamiento de Enteros, y por lo tanto hace posible asignar una gran fragmento de memoria en la pila, con un tamaño controlado por un atacante, como es demostrado por pdftocairo. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/109342 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2713 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/blob/master/NEWS https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/10/msg00024.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/11/msg00014.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00030.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5ZOYOZTGU4RGZW4E63OZ7LW4SMPEWGBV https://lists.fedoraproject • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 1

SDL (Simple DirectMedia Layer) through 1.2.15 and 2.x through 2.0.9 has a heap-based buffer over-read in BlitNtoN in video/SDL_blit_N.c when called from SDL_SoftBlit in video/SDL_blit.c. hasta 2.0.9, presenta una lectura excesiva del búfer en la región heap de la memoria en BlitNtoN en el archivo video/SDL_blit_N.c cuando es llamado desde SDL_SoftBlit en el archivo video/SDL_blit.c. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in SDL in the SDL_BlitCopy() function, that was called while copying an existing surface into a new optimized one, due to lack of validation while loading a BMP image in the SDL_LoadBMP_RW() function. An application that uses SDL to parse untrusted input files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which could allow an attacker to make the application crash or possibly execute code. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00029.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00030.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00093.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00094.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3950 https:/ • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 15%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0

A heap-buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the Redis hyperloglog data structure versions 3.x before 3.2.13, 4.x before 4.0.14 and 5.x before 5.0.4. By carefully corrupting a hyperloglog using the SETRANGE command, an attacker could trick Redis interpretation of dense HLL encoding to write up to 3 bytes beyond the end of a heap-allocated buffer. Se detectó una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento del búfer de la pila en hyperloglog data structure versiones 3.x anteriores a 3.2.13, versiones 4.x anteriores a 4.0.14 y versiones 5.x anteriores a 5.0.4 de Redis. Por la corrupción cuidadosa de un hyperloglog usando el comando SETRANGE, un atacante podría engañar la interpretación de Redis de codificación HLL densa para escribir hasta 3 bytes más allá del final de un búfer asignado a la pila. A heap buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the Redis HyperLogLog data structure. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/109290 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1819 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1860 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2002 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2506 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2508 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2621 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2630 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10192 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antir • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 18%CPEs: 22EXPL: 0

A stack-buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the Redis hyperloglog data structure versions 3.x before 3.2.13, 4.x before 4.0.14 and 5.x before 5.0.4. By corrupting a hyperloglog using the SETRANGE command, an attacker could cause Redis to perform controlled increments of up to 12 bytes past the end of a stack-allocated buffer. Se detectó una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento del búfer de la pila en hyperloglog data structure de Redis en las versiones 3.x anteriores a 3.2.13, versiones 4.x anteriores a 4.0.14 y versiones 5.x anteriores a 5.0.4. Por la corrupción de un hiperloglog usando el comando SETRANGE, un atacante podría causar que Redis realizara incrementos controlados de hasta 12 bytes más allá del final de un búfer asignado a la pila. A stack buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the Redis HyperLogLog data structure. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/109290 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1819 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2002 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10193 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/4.0/00-RELEASENOTES https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/5.0/00-RELEASENOTES https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jul/19 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201908-0 • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •