Page 37 of 233 results (0.024 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 91EXPL: 0

CVE-2019-11477 – Integer overflow in TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11477

Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. Jonathan Looney detectó que el valor TCP_SKB_CB(skb)-mayor que tcp_gso_segs estuvo sujeto a un desbordamiento de enteros en el kernel de Linux durante el manejo del Reconocimiento Selectivo (SACK) de TCP. Un atacante remoto podría usar esto para causar una denegación de servicio. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153346/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0052-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154951/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0058-1.html http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20191225-01-kernel-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/20/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss&# • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 96%CPEs: 90EXPL: 0

CVE-2019-11478 – SACK can cause extensive memory use via fragmented resend queue

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11478

Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. Jonathan Looney descubrió que la implementación de la cola de retransmisión de TCP en tcp_fragment en el kernel de Linux podría estar fragmentada cuando se manejan ciertas secuencias de Reconocimiento Selectivo (SACK) de TCP. Un atacante remoto podría usar esto para causar una denegación de servicio. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153346/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0052-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154408/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0055-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154951/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0058-1.html http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists& • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 96EXPL: 0

CVE-2019-11479 – kernel: tcp: excessive resource consumption for TCP connections with low MSS allows remote denial of service

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11479

Jonathan Looney discovered that the Linux kernel default MSS is hard-coded to 48 bytes. This allows a remote peer to fragment TCP resend queues significantly more than if a larger MSS were enforced. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commits 967c05aee439e6e5d7d805e195b3a20ef5c433d6 and 5f3e2bf008c2221478101ee72f5cb4654b9fc363. Jonathan Looney descubrió que el tamaño máximo de segmento (MSS) por defecto del kernel de Linux está codificado a 48 bytes. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108818 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1594 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1602 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1699 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabili • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 84EXPL: 0

CVE-2019-12295

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-12295

In Wireshark 3.0.0 to 3.0.1, 2.6.0 to 2.6.8, and 2.4.0 to 2.4.14, the dissection engine could crash. This was addressed in epan/packet.c by restricting the number of layers and consequently limiting recursion. En Wireshark versión 3.0.0 a 3.0.1, versión 2.6.0 a 2.6.8 y versión 2.4.0 a 2.4.14, el motor de disección podría fallar. Esto fue direccionado en epan/packet.c por la restricción del número de capas y por consiguiente limitando la recursión. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108464 https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15778 https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=7b6e197da4c497e229ed3ebf6952bae5c426a820 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/10/msg00036.html https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06725231 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06725231?utm_source=f5support&amp%3Butm_medium=RSS https://usn.ubuntu.com/4133-1 https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2019-19.html • CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •

CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0

CVE-2019-6618

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6618

On BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.1, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4, and 11.5.2-11.5.8, users with the Resource Administrator role can modify sensitive portions of the filesystem if provided Advanced Shell Access, such as editing /etc/passwd. This allows modifications to user objects and is contrary to our definition for the Resource Administrator (RA) role restrictions. En BIG-IP versiones desde la 14.0.0.0 hasta la 14.1.0.1, desde la 13.0.0 hasta la 13.1.1.1.4, desde la 12.1.0 hasta la 12.1.4, desde la 11.6.1 hasta la 11.6.3.4, y desde la 11.5.2 hasta la 11.5.8, los usuarios con el rol Resource Administrator (Administrador de Recursos) pueden modificar partes sensibles del sistema de archivos si se les proporciona acceso avanzado a la Consola, como por ejemplo, editar /etc/passwd. Esto permite modificar los objetos de usuario y es contrario a nuestra definición de las restricciones de función del Resource Administrator (RA). • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K07702240 •