CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 82%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9514 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9514
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 81EXPL: 2CVE-2019-10744 – nodejs-lodash: prototype pollution in defaultsDeep function leading to modifying properties
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10744
Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. Las versiones de lodash inferiores a 4.17.12, son vulnerables a la Contaminación de Prototipo. La función defaultsDeep podría ser engañada para agregar o modificar las propiedades de Object.prototype usando una carga útil de constructor. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in lodash. • https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-10744 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3024 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191004-0005 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASH-450202 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K47105354?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10744 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 78EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6640
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6640
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.8, SNMP exposes sensitive configuration objects over insecure transmission channels. This issue is exposed when a passphrase is inserted into various profile types and accessed using SNMPv2. En BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4 y 11.5.1-11.5 .8, SNMP expone objetos de configuración sensibles sobre canales de transmisión no seguros. Este problema se expone cuando una frase de contraseña se inserta en varios tipos de perfil y se accede mediante SNMPv2. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/109089 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K40443301 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K40443301?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS • CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6634
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6634
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, and 12.1.0-12.1.4, a high volume of malformed analytics report requests leads to instability in restjavad process. This causes issues with both iControl REST and some portions of TMUI. The attack requires an authenticated user with any role. En BIG-IP versiones 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, y 12.1.0-12.1.4 un gran volumen de solicitudes de informes de análisis mal formados conduce a la inestabilidad en el proceso de restjavad. Esto causa problemas tanto con iControl REST como con algunas partes de TMUI. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/109104 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K64855220 •