CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6678
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6678
On BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, and 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, the TMM process may restart when the packet filter feature is enabled. En BIG-IP versiones 15.0.0 hasta 15.0.1, 14.1.0 hasta 14.1.2.2, 14.0.0 hasta 14.0.1 y 13.1.0 hasta 13.1.3.1, el proceso TMM puede reiniciarse cuando la funcionalidad packet filter está habilitada . • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K04897373 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6677
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6677
On BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, and 12.1.0-12.1.5, under certain conditions when using custom TCP congestion control settings in a TCP profile, TMM stops processing traffic when processed by an iRule. En BIG-IP versiones 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1 y 12.1.0-12.1.5, bajo determinadas condiciones cuando usando configuraciones de control de congestión TCP personalizadas en un perfil TCP, TMM deja de procesar el tráfico cuando es procesado mediante una iRule. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06747393 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6676
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6676
On versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.0.0-14.1.2.2, and 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, TMM may restart on BIG-IP Virtual Edition (VE) when using virtio direct descriptors and packets 2 KB or larger. En las versiones 15.0.0 hasta15.0.1, 14.0.0 hasta 14.1.2.2 y 13.1.0 hasta 13.1.3.1, TMM puede reiniciarse en BIG-IP Virtual Edition (VE) cuando se usan descriptores directos de virtio y paquetes de 2 KB o mas grandes. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K92002212 •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 264EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6675
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6675
BIG-IP configurations using Active Directory, LDAP, or Client Certificate LDAP for management authentication with multiple servers are exposed to a vulnerability which allows an authentication bypass. This can result in a complete compromise of the system. This issue only impacts specific engineering hotfixes using the aforementioned authentication configuration. NOTE: This vulnerability does not affect any of the BIG-IP major, minor or maintenance releases you obtained from downloads.f5.com. The affected Engineering Hotfix builds are as follows: Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.3.0.79.6-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.3.0.97.6-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.3.0.99.6-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.5.0.15.5-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.5.0.36.5-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.5.0.40.5-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.6.0.11.9-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.6.0.14.9-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.6.0.68.9-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.0.6.0.70.9-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.0.11.37-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.0.18.37-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.0.32.37-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.46.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.14.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.16.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.34.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.97.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.99.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.105.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.111.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.115.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-14.1.2.1.0.122.4-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-15.0.1.0.33.11-ENG.iso, Hotfix-BIGIP-15.0.1.0.48.11-ENG.iso Las configuraciones BIG-IP que utilizan Active Directory, LDAP o Client Certificate LDAP para la autenticación de administración con varios servidores están expuestas a una vulnerabilidad que permite una omisión de identificación. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K55655944 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K55655944?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •