CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 1CVE-2014-8130 – libtiff: divide by zero in the tiffdither tool
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8130
The _TIFFmalloc function in tif_unix.c in LibTIFF 4.0.3 does not reject a zero size, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero error and application crash) via a crafted TIFF image that is mishandled by the TIFFWriteScanline function in tif_write.c, as demonstrated by tiffdither. La función _TIFFmalloc en tif_unix.c en LibTIFF 4.0.3 no rechaza un tamaño cero, lo que permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (error de división entre cero y cierre inesperado de la aplicación) mediante una imagen TIFF manipulada que es gestionada incorrectamente por la función TIFFWriteScanline en tif_write.c, tal y como demuestra tiffdither. • http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00002.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/24/15 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1546.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1547.html http://support.apple.com/kb/HT204941 http://support.apple.com/kb/HT204942 http://www.conostix.com/pub/adv/CVE-2014-8130 • CWE-369: Divide By Zero •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 2CVE-2014-8129 – libtiff: out-of-bounds read/write with malformed TIFF image in tiff2pdf
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8129
LibTIFF 4.0.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted TIFF image, as demonstrated by failure of tif_next.c to verify that the BitsPerSample value is 2, and the t2p_sample_lab_signed_to_unsigned function in tiff2pdf.c. LibTIFF 4.0.3 permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (escritura fuera de límites) u otro tipo de impacto sin especificar mediante una imagen TIFF manipulada. Esto se demuestra por el fracaso de tif_next.c a la hora de verificar que el valor de BitsPerSample es 2 y la función t2p_sample_lab_signed_to_unsigned en tiff2pdf.c. • http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2487 http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2488 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00002.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/24/15 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1546.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1547.html http://support.apple.com/kb/HT204941 http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2049 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 33EXPL: 20CVE-2015-0235 – Exim ESMTP 4.80 - glibc gethostbyname Denial of Service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0235
Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) gethostbyname or (2) gethostbyname2 function, aka "GHOST." Desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria dinámica en la función __nss_hostname_digits_dots en glibc 2.2, y otras versiones 2.x anteriores a 2.18, permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto ejecutar código arbitrario a través de vectores relacionados con la funciín (1) gethostbyname o (2) gethostbyname2, también conocido como 'GHOST.' A heap-based buffer overflow was found in glibc's __nss_hostname_digits_dots() function, which is used by the gethostbyname() and gethostbyname2() glibc function calls. A remote attacker able to make an application call either of these functions could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the user running the application. The industrial managed switch series 852 from WAGO is affected by multiple vulnerabilities such as old software components embedded in the firmware. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35951 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36421 https://github.com/aaronfay/CVE-2015-0235-test https://github.com/makelinux/CVE-2015-0235-workaround https://github.com/sUbc0ol/CVE-2015-0235 https://github.com/mikesplain/CVE-2015-0235-cookbook https://github.com/tobyzxj/CVE-2015-0235 https://github.com/adherzog/ansible-CVE-2015-0235-GHOST http://blogs.sophos.com/2015/01/29/sophos-products-and-the-ghost-vulnerability-affecting-linux http:/ • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 2.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 41EXPL: 0CVE-2014-9584 – kernel: isofs: unchecked printing of ER records
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-9584
The parse_rock_ridge_inode_internal function in fs/isofs/rock.c in the Linux kernel before 3.18.2 does not validate a length value in the Extensions Reference (ER) System Use Field, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information from kernel memory via a crafted iso9660 image. La función parse_rock_ridge_inode_internal en fs/isofs/rock.c en el kernel de Linux anterior a 3.18.2 no valida un valor de longitud en el campo Extensions Reference (ER) System Use, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener información sensible de la memoria del kernel a través de una imagen iso9660 manipulada. An information leak flaw was found in the way the Linux kernel's ISO9660 file system implementation accessed data on an ISO9660 image with RockRidge Extension Reference (ER) records. An attacker with physical access to the system could use this flaw to disclose up to 255 bytes of kernel memory. • http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4e2024624e678f0ebb916e6192bd23c1f9fdf696 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00009.html http://lists.o • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 2.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 39EXPL: 1CVE-2014-9585 – kernel: ASLR bruteforce possible for vdso library
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-9585
The vdso_addr function in arch/x86/vdso/vma.c in the Linux kernel through 3.18.2 does not properly choose memory locations for the vDSO area, which makes it easier for local users to bypass the ASLR protection mechanism by guessing a location at the end of a PMD. La función vdso_addr en arch/x86/vdso/vma.c en el kernel de Linux hasta 3.18.2 no elige correctamente localizaciones de memoria para la área vDSO, lo que facilita a usuarios locales evadir el mecanismo de protección ASLR mediante la adivinación de una localización al final de un PMD. An information leak flaw was found in the way the Linux kernel's Virtual Dynamic Shared Object (vDSO) implementation performed address randomization. A local, unprivileged user could use this flaw to leak kernel memory addresses to user-space. • http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=bc3b94c31d65e761ddfe150d02932c65971b74e2 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=fbe1bf140671619508dfa575d74a185ae53c5dbb http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148480.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg0 •