CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2015-8776 – glibc: Segmentation fault caused by passing out-of-range data to strftime()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8776
The strftime function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly obtain sensitive information via an out-of-range time value. La función strftime en la GNU C Library (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente obtener información sensible a través de un valor de tiempo fuera de rango. It was found that out-of-range time values passed to the strftime() function could result in an out-of-bounds memory access. This could lead to application crash or, potentially, information disclosure. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184626.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00042.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0680.html http&# • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2015-0192 – JDK: unspecified Java sandbox restrictions bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0192
Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en IBM Java 8 anterior a SR1, 7 R1 anterior a SR2 FP11, 7 anterior a SR9, 6 R1 anterior a SR8 FP4, 6 anterior a SR16 FP4, y 5.0 anterior a SR16 FP10 permite a atacantes remotos ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con Java Virtual Machine. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00031.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1006.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1007.html http://rhn.redhat.com&#x •
CVSS: 2.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3340
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3340
Xen 4.2.x through 4.5.x does not initialize certain fields, which allows certain remote service domains to obtain sensitive information from memory via a (1) XEN_DOMCTL_gettscinfo or (2) XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist request. Xen 4.2.x hasta 4.5.x no inicializa ciertos campos, lo que permite a ciertos dominios de servicio remotos obtener información sensible de la memoria a través de una solicitud (1) XEN_DOMCTL_gettscinfo o (2) XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/156005.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/156979.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/157006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00018.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00001.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3414 h • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 160EXPL: 0CVE-2015-2808 – SSL/TLS: "Invariance Weakness" vulnerability in RC4 stream cipher
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-2808
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. El algoritmo RC4, utilizado en el protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL, no combina correctamente los datos de estados con los datos de claves durante la fase de inicialización, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro contra los bytes iniciales de un flujo mediante la captura de trafico de la red que ocasionalmente depende de claves afectadas por la debilidad de la invariabilidad (Invariance Weakness), y posteriormente utilizar un acercamiento de fuerza bruta que involucra valores LSB, también conocido como el problema de 'Bar Mitzvah'. • http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •