Page 4 of 72 results (0.006 seconds)

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Meeting Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a customized link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected device by using a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Una vulnerabilidad en la interfaz de gestión basada en web de Cisco Meeting Server podría permitir que un atacante remoto sin autenticar lleve a cabo un ataque de Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) y realice acciones arbitrarias en un dispositivo afectado. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105287 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041680 https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180905-meeting-csrf • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 74%CPEs: 127EXPL: 0

Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. El kernel de Linux en versiones 4.9 y siguientes pueden forzarse a realizar llamadas muy caras a tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() y tcp_prune_ofo_queue() para cada paquete entrante, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. A flaw named SegmentSmack was found in the way the Linux kernel handled specially crafted TCP packets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to trigger time and calculation expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() functions by sending specially modified packets within ongoing TCP sessions which could lead to a CPU saturation and hence a denial of service on the system. Maintaining the denial of service condition requires continuous two-way TCP sessions to a reachable open port, thus the attacks cannot be performed using spoofed IP addresses. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20181031-02-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104976 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041424 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041434 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Cisco Webex Network Recording Player for Advanced Recording Format (ARF) and Webex Recording Format (WRF) files. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by providing a user with a malicious .arf or .wrf file via email or URL and convincing the user to launch the file in the Webex recording players. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow arbitrary code execution on the system of a targeted user. These vulnerabilities affect ARF and WRF recording players available from Cisco Webex Meetings Suite sites, Cisco Webex Meetings Online sites, and Cisco Webex Meetings Server. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi02621, CSCvi02965, CSCvi63329, CSCvi63333, CSCvi63335, CSCvi63374, CSCvi63376, CSCvi63377, CSCvi63391, CSCvi63392, CSCvi63396, CSCvi63495, CSCvi63497, CSCvi63498, CSCvi82684, CSCvi82700, CSCvi82705, CSCvi82725, CSCvi82737, CSCvi82742, CSCvi82760, CSCvi82771, CSCvj51284, CSCvj51294. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104853 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041347 https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180718-webex-rce • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in the session identification management functionality of the web-based management interface for Cisco Meeting Server could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to hijack a valid user session identifier, aka Session Fixation. The vulnerability exists because the affected application does not assign a new session identifier to a user session when a user authenticates to the application. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a hijacked session identifier to connect to the application through the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to hijack an authenticated user's browser session. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi23787. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104583 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041174 https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180620-cms-sf • CWE-384: Session Fixation •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in the Web Admin Interface of Cisco Meeting Server could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of incoming HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the Web Admin Interface of an affected Cisco Meeting Server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to restart the system, terminating all ongoing calls and resulting in a DoS condition on the affected product. This vulnerability affects the following releases of Cisco Meeting Server: Acano X-Series, Cisco Meeting Server 1000, Cisco Meeting Server 2000. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104582 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041175 https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180620-meeting-server-dos • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •