CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2003-1004
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2003-1004
17 Dec 2003 — Cisco PIX firewall 6.2.x through 6.2.3, when configured as a VPN Client, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (dropped IPSec tunnel connection) via an IKE Phase I negotiation request to the outside interface of the firewall. Cisco PIX Firewall 6.2.x a 6.2.3, cuando se configura como un cliente VPN, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (conexión túnel IPSec descartada) mediante una petición de negociación IKE (intercambio de claves) Fase 1 al interfaz externo del cort... • http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20031215-pix.shtml •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 6%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2003-0851
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2003-0851
06 Nov 2003 — OpenSSL 0.9.6k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash via large recursion) via malformed ASN.1 sequences. OpenSSL 0.9.6k, cuando se ejecuta en Windows, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída por recursión excesiva) mediante secuencias ASN.1 malformadas. • ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2004-003.txt.asc •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2002-2139
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-2139
31 Dec 2002 — Cisco PIX Firewall 6.0.3 and earlier, and 6.1.x to 6.1.3, do not delete the duplicate ISAKMP SAs for a user's VPN session, which allows local users to hijack a session via a man-in-the-middle attack. • http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/n-017.shtml •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2002-2140
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-2140
31 Dec 2002 — Buffer overflow in Cisco PIX Firewall 5.2.x to 5.2.8, 6.0.x to 6.0.3, 6.1.x to 6.1.3, and 6.2.x to 6.2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via HTTP traffic authentication using (1) TACACS+ or (2) RADIUS. • http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/n-017.shtml •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 102EXPL: 0CVE-2002-1024
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-1024
04 Oct 2002 — Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.2, when supporting SSH, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a large packet that was designed to exploit the SSH CRC32 attack detection overflow (CVE-2001-0144). • http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/SSH-scanning.shtml • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 7%CPEs: 8EXPL: 2CVE-2000-1022 – Cisco PIX Firewall 4.x/5.x - SMTP Content Filtering Evasion
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-1022
11 Dec 2000 — The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/20231 •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 5%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2CVE-2000-1027 – Cisco PIX Firewall 5.2 - PASV Mode FTP Internal Address Disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-1027
11 Dec 2000 — Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) allows remote attackers to determine the real IP address of a target FTP server by flooding the server with PASV requests, which includes the real IP address in the response when passive mode is established. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/20369 •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2000-0150
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-0150
12 Feb 2000 — Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to bypass port access restrictions on an FTP server by forcing it to send malicious packets that Firewall-1 misinterprets as a valid 227 response to a client's PASV attempt. • http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/328867 •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-1999-0158
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-1999-0158
31 Aug 1998 — Cisco PIX firewall manager (PFM) on Windows NT allows attackers to connect to port 8080 on the PFM server and retrieve any file whose name and location is known. • http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/pixmgrfile-pub.shtml •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-1999-0157
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-1999-0157
18 Aug 1998 — Cisco PIX firewall and CBAC IP fragmentation attack results in a denial of service. • http://www.osvdb.org/1097 •