CVE-2004-2405
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-2405
Buffer overflow in multiple F-Secure Anti-Virus products, including F-Secure Anti-Virus 5.42 and earlier, allows remote attackers to bypass scanning or cause a denial of service (crash or module restart), depending on the product, via a malformed LHA archive. • http://secunia.com/advisories/11712 http://www.f-secure.com/security/fsc-2004-1.shtml https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16258 •
CVE-2004-2276
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-2276
F-Secure Anti-Virus 5.41 and 5.42 on Windows, Client Security 5.50 and 5.52, 4.60 for Samba Servers, and 4.52 and earlier for Linux does not properly detect certain viruses in a PKZip archive, which allows viruses such as Sober.D and Sober.G to bypass initial detection. • http://secunia.com/advisories/11699 http://support.f-secure.com/enu/corporate/downloads/hotfixes/av-linux-hotfixes.shtml http://support.f-secure.de/ger/home/downloads/hotfixes/av5-hotfixes.shtml http://www.osvdb.org/6409 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16243 •
CVE-2004-0830
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0830
The Content Scanner Server in F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange 6.21 and earlier, F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange 6.01 and earlier, and F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper 6.32 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service crash due to unhandled exception) via a certain malformed packet. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109483205925698&w=2 http://www.f-secure.com/security/fsc-2004-2.shtml http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=137&type=vulnerabilities http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11145 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17307 •
CVE-2004-0235
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0235
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in LHA 1.14 allow remote attackers or local users to create arbitrary files via an LHA archive containing filenames with (1) .. sequences or (2) absolute pathnames with double leading slashes ("//absolute/path"). Múltiples vulnerabilidades de atravesamiento de directorios en LHA 1.14 permite a atacantes locales o usuarios locales crear ficheros arbitrarios mediante un archivo LHA conteniendo nombres de fichero con secuencias (1) ".." (punto punto) o (2) rutas absolutas con barra inicial doble ("//ruta/absoluta"). • http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000840 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/020776.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108422737918885&w=2 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200405-02.xml http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-515 http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2004-May/msg00005.html http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-178.html http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-179.html h •
CVE-2004-0234
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0234
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the get_header function in header.c for LHA 1.14, as used in products such as Barracuda Spam Firewall, allow remote attackers or local users to execute arbitrary code via long directory or file names in an LHA archive, which triggers the overflow when testing or extracting the archive. Múltiples desbordamientos de búfer basados en la pila en la función get_header de header.c de LHA 1.14 utilizado en productos como Barracuda Spam Firewall, permite a atacantes remotos o a usuarios locales ejecutar código arbitrario mediante nombres de fichero o de directorio largos en un archivo LHA, lo que dispara el desbordamiento cuando se prueba o se extrae un fichero. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-04/0059.html http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000840 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/020776.html http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/020778.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108422737918885&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/19514 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200405-02.xml http://securitytracker.com/id?1015866 http://www.debian.org/securi • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •