Page 4 of 41 results (0.006 seconds)

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

"A vulnerability in the TLS protocol implementation of the Domino server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information, aka a Return of Bleichenbacher's Oracle Threat (ROBOT) attack. An attacker could iteratively query a server running a vulnerable TLS stack implementation to perform cryptanalytic operations that may allow decryption of previously captured TLS sessions." "Una vulnerabilidad en la implementación del protocolo TLS del servidor Domino podría permitir a un atacante remoto no autenticado acceder a información confidencial, también se conoce como un ataque de tipo Oracle Threat (ROBOT) de Return of Bleichenbacher. Un atacante podría consultar iterativamente un servidor que ejecuta una implementación de pila TLS vulnerable para llevar a cabo operaciones criptoanalíticas que pueden permitir un descifrado de sesiones TLS capturadas previamente" • https://support.hcltechsw.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0080545 • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength •

CVSS: 8.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0

IBM Domino 9.0 and 9.0.1 could allow an attacker to execute commands on the system by triggering a buffer overflow in the parsing of command line arguments passed to nsd.exe. IBM X-force ID: 148687. IBM Domino 9.0 y 9.0.1 podría permitir que un atacante ejecute comandos en el sistema desencadenando un desbordamiento de búfer en el análisis de los argumentos de la línea de comandos que se pasan a nsd.exe. IBM X-Force ID: 148687. • https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/148687 https://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ibm10743405 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

IBM Domino 8.5 and 9.0 could allow an attacker to steal credentials using multiple sessions and large amounts of data using Domino TLS Key Exchange validation. IBM X-Force ID: 117918. IBM Domino versiones 8.5 y 9.0 podría permitir a un atacante robar credenciales utilizando varias sesiones y grandes cantidades de datos mediante la validación de Domino TLS Key Exchange. IBM X-Force ID: 117918. • http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22002808 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98794 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038606 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/117918 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 1

IBM Domino 8.5.3, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a stack based overflow in the IMAP service that could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by specifying a large mailbox name. IBM X-Force ID: 124749. IBM Domino versiones 8.5.3 y 9.0 es vulnerable a desbordamiento basado en pila en el servicio IMAP lo que podría permitir a un atacante autenticado ejecutar código arbitrario especificando un nombre largo de buzón. IBM X-Force ID: 124749. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46808 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152786/Lotus-Domino-8.5.3-EXAMINE-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22002280 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97910 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98019 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038358 https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/676632 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

IBM Domino 9.0.1 Fix Pack 3 Interim Fix 2 through 9.0.1 Fix Pack 5 Interim Fix 1, when using TLS and AES GCM, uses random nonce generation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain the authentication key and spoof data by leveraging the reuse of a nonce in a session and a "forbidden attack." NOTE: this CVE has been incorrectly used for GCM nonce reuse issues in other products; see CVE-2016-10213 for the A10 issue, CVE-2016-10212 for the Radware issue, and CVE-2017-5933 for the Citrix issue. IBM Domino 9.0.1 Fix Pack 3 Interim Fix 2 hasta la versión 9.0.1 Fix Pack 5 Interim Fix 1, cuando se usa TLS y AES GCM, utiliza generación aleatoria de nonce, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos obtener la clave de autenticación y suplantar datos aprovechando la reutilización de un nonce en una sesión y un "ataque prohibido". NOTA: esta CVE ha sido usada incorrectamente para problemas de reutilización de GCM nonce en otros productos; ver CVE-2016-10213 para el problema A10, CVE-2016-10212 para el problema Radware y CVE-2017-5933 para el problema Citrix. • http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96062 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037795 https://github.com/nonce-disrespect/nonce-disrespect https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX220329 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •