Page 4 of 19 results (0.010 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 166EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-8147

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-8147

AC6005 V200R006C10SPC200,AC6605 V200R006C10SPC200,AR1200 with software V200R005C10CP0582T, V200R005C10HP0581T, V200R005C20SPC026T,AR200 with software V200R005C20SPC026T,AR3200 V200R005C20SPC026T,CloudEngine 12800 with software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 5800 with software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 6800 with software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 7800 with software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 8800 with software V100R006C00, V200R001C00,E600 V200R008C00,S12700 with software V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S1700 with software V100R006C00, V100R007C00, V200R006C00,S2300 with software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C03, V100R006C05, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R005C01, V200R005C02, V200R005C03, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S2700 with software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C03, V100R006C05, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R005C01, V200R005C02, V200R005C03, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S5300 with software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C01, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S5700 with software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C01, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S6300 with software V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R008C00,S6700 with software V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S7700 with software V100R003C00, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S9300 with software V100R001C00, V100R002C00, V100R003C00, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00, V200R008C10,S9700 with software V200R001C00, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,Secospace USG6600 V500R001C00SPC050 have a MaxAge LSA vulnerability due to improper OSPF implementation. When the device receives special LSA packets, the LS (Link Status) age would be set to MaxAge, 3600 seconds. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to poison the route table and launch a DoS attack. AC6005 V200R006C10SPC200,AC6605 V200R006C10SPC200,AR1200 con software V200R005C10CP0582T, V200R005C10HP0581T, V200R005C20SPC026T,AR200 con software V200R005C20SPC026T,AR3200 V200R005C20SPC026T,CloudEngine 12800 con software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 5800 con software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 6800 con software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 7800 con software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 8800 con software V100R006C00, V200R001C00,E600 V200R008C00,S12700 con software V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S1700 con software V100R006C00, V100R007C00, V200R006C00,S2300 con software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C03, V100R006C05, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R005C01, V200R005C02, V200R005C03, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S2700 con software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C03, V100R006C05, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R005C01, V200R005C02, V200R005C03, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S5300 con software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C01, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S5700 con software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C01, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S6300 con software V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R008C00,S6700 con software V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S7700 con software V100R003C00, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S9300 con software V100R001C00, V100R002C00, V100R003C00, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00, V200R008C10,S9700 con software V200R001C00, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00 y Secospace USG6600 V500R001C00SPC050 tienen una vulnerabilidad MaxAge LSA debido a una implementación OSPF incorrecta. Cuando el dispositivo recibe paquetes LSA especiales, la propiedad age del LS (Link Status) sería igual al de MaxAge, 3600 segundos. • http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20170720-01-ospf-en • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 121EXPL: 0

CVE-2015-3913

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3913

The IP stack in multiple Huawei Campus series switch models allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reboot) via a crafted ICMP request message. En varios modelos de switch de la serie Huawei Campus, la pila IP permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (reinicio) a través de un mensaje de solicitud ICMP manipulado. • http://www1.huawei.com/en/security/psirt/security-bulletins/security-advisories/hw-427449.htm • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 59EXPL: 0

CVE-2014-8572

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8572

Huawei AC6605 with software V200R001C00; AC6605 with software V200R002C00; ACU with software V200R001C00; ACU with software V200R002C00; S2300, S3300, S2700, S3700 with software V100R006C05 and earlier versions; S5300, S5700, S6300, S6700 with software V100R006, V200R001, V200R002, V200R003, V200R005C00SPC300 and earlier versions; S7700, S9300, S9300E, S9700 with software V100R006, V200R001, V200R002, V200R003, V200R005C00SPC300 and earlier versions could allow remote attackers to send a special SSH packet to the VRP device to cause a denial of service. Huawei AC6605 con software V200R001C00; AC6605 con software V200R002C00; ACU con software V200R001C00; ACU con software V200R002C00; S2300, S3300, S2700, S3700 con software V100R006C05 y versiones anteriores; S5300, S5700, S6300, S6700 con software V100R006, V200R001, V200R002, V200R003, V200R005C00SPC300 y versiones anteriores; S7700, S9300, S9300E, S9700 con software V100R006, V200R001, V200R002, V200R003, V200R005C00SPC300 y versiones anteriores podrían permitir a atacantes remotos enviar un paquete SSH especial al dispositivo VRP para provocar una denegación de servicio. • http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/hw-373182 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 160EXPL: 0

CVE-2015-2808 – SSL/TLS: "Invariance Weakness" vulnerability in RC4 stream cipher

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-2808

The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. El algoritmo RC4, utilizado en el protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL, no combina correctamente los datos de estados con los datos de claves durante la fase de inicialización, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro contra los bytes iniciales de un flujo mediante la captura de trafico de la red que ocasionalmente depende de claves afectadas por la debilidad de la invariabilidad (Invariance Weakness), y posteriormente utilizar un acercamiento de fuerza bruta que involucra valores LSB, también conocido como el problema de 'Bar Mitzvah'. • http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •