CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2CVE-2008-1270 – Lighttpd 1.4.x - mod_userdir Information Disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-1270
mod_userdir in lighttpd 1.4.18 and earlier, when userdir.path is not set, uses a default of $HOME, which might allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files, as demonstrated by accessing the ~nobody directory. mod_userdir en lighttpd 1.4.18 y anteriores, cuando no está establecido el userdir.path usa un $HOME por defecto, que podría permitir a atacantes remotos leer ficheros de su elección como se ha demostrado accediendo al directorio ~nobody. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/31396 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-04/msg00005.html http://secunia.com/advisories/29318 http://secunia.com/advisories/29403 http://secunia.com/advisories/29622 http://secunia.com/advisories/29636 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200804-08.xml http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/1587 http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0106 http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1521 http://www.lighttpd. • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 10%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2008-0983
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-0983
lighttpd 1.4.18, and possibly other versions before 1.5.0, does not properly calculate the size of a file descriptor array, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a large number of connections, which triggers an out-of-bounds access. lighttpd 1.4.18 y posiblemente otras versiones anteriores a la 1.5.0, no calcula correctamente el tamaño del array descriptor de archivos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) a través de un gran número de conexiones, lo cual dispara un acceso fuera de límite. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-04/msg00005.html http://secunia.com/advisories/29066 http://secunia.com/advisories/29166 http://secunia.com/advisories/29209 http://secunia.com/advisories/29268 http://secunia.com/advisories/29622 http://secunia.com/advisories/31104 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200803-10.xml http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/1562 http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0084 http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1609&# • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 29%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2007-4727
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-4727
Buffer overflow in the fcgi_env_add function in mod_proxy_backend_fastcgi.c in the mod_fastcgi extension in lighttpd before 1.4.18 allows remote attackers to overwrite arbitrary CGI variables and execute arbitrary code via an HTTP request with a long content length, as demonstrated by overwriting the SCRIPT_FILENAME variable, aka a "header overflow." Desbordamiento de búfer en la función fcgi_env_add de mod_proxy_backend_fastcgi.c en la extensión mod_fastcgi en lighttpd anterior a 1.4.18 permite a atacantes remotos sobrescribir variables CGI de su elección y ejecutar código de su elección mediante una petición HTTP con una longitud de contenido larga, como se ha demostrado sobrescribiendo la variable SCRIPT_FILENAME, también conocido como "desbordamiento de cabecera". • http://fedoranews.org/updates/FEDORA-2007-213.shtml http://secunia.com/advisories/26732 http://secunia.com/advisories/26794 http://secunia.com/advisories/26824 http://secunia.com/advisories/26997 http://secunia.com/advisories/27229 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3127 http://secweb.se/en/advisories/lighttpd-fastcgi-remote-vulnerability http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/changeset/1986 http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200709-16.xml http://www.lighttpd.net/assets/2007 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 15%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1CVE-2007-3947 – Lighttpd 1.4.15 - Multiple Code Execution / Denial of Service / Information Disclosure Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-3947
request.c in lighttpd 1.4.15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) by sending an HTTP request with duplicate headers, as demonstrated by a request containing two Location header lines, which results in a segmentation fault. request.c en lighttpd 1.4.15 permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (caida de demonio) a través del envío de una respuesta HTTP con cabeceras duplicadas, como se demostró con una respuesta que contiene dos lineas de cabecera Location, el cual deriva en un fallo de segmentación. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/30322 http://osvdb.org/38313 http://secunia.com/advisories/26130 http://secunia.com/advisories/26158 http://secunia.com/advisories/26505 http://secunia.com/advisories/26593 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200708-11.xml http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/changeset/1869 http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/1232 http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1362 http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2007_15_sr.html http:/& •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 6%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2007-3950
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-3950
lighttpd 1.4.15, when run on 32 bit platforms, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unspecified vectors involving the use of incompatible format specifiers in certain debugging messages in the (1) mod_scgi, (2) mod_fastcgi, and (3) mod_webdav modules. lighttpd 1.4.15, cuando funciona bajo plataformas de 32 bits, permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (caida de demonio) a través de vectores no especificados afectando al uso de especificaciones de formatos incompatibles en ciertos mensajes de depuración en los módulos (1) mod_scgi, (2) mod_fastcgi, y (3) mod_webdav. • http://secunia.com/advisories/26130 http://secunia.com/advisories/26158 http://secunia.com/advisories/26505 http://secunia.com/advisories/26593 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200708-11.xml http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2909 http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/changeset/1882 http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/1263 http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1362 http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2007_15_sr.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1& •