CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 190EXPL: 0CVE-2021-0060
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-0060
Insufficient compartmentalization in HECI subsystem for the Intel(R) SPS before versions SPS_E5_04.01.04.516.0, SPS_E5_04.04.04.033.0, SPS_E5_04.04.03.281.0, SPS_E5_03.01.03.116.0, SPS_E3_05.01.04.309.0, SPS_02.04.00.101.0, SPS_SoC-A_05.00.03.114.0, SPS_SoC-X_04.00.04.326.0, SPS_SoC-X_03.00.03.117.0, IGN_E5_91.00.00.167.0, SPS_PHI_03.01.03.078.0 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access. Una Compartimentación no suficiente en el subsistema HECI para el SPS de Intel(R) versiones a SPS_E5_04.01.04.516.0, SPS_E5_04.04.04.03.0, SPS_E5_04.04.03.281.0, SPS_E5_03.01.03.116.0, SPS_E3_05.01.04.309.0, SPS_02.04.00.101. 0, SPS_SoC-A_05.00.03.114.0, SPS_SoC-X_04.00.04.326.0, SPS_SoC-X_03.00.03.117.0, IGN_E5_91.00.00.167.0, SPS_PHI_03.01.03.078.0 pueden permitir a un usuario autenticado habilitar potencialmente una escalada de privilegios por medio del acceso físico • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220210-0005 https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00470.html •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 681EXPL: 0CVE-2021-0099
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-0099
Insufficient control flow management in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access. Una administración no suficiente del flujo de control en el firmware de algunos procesadores Intel(R) puede permitir a un usuario autenticado habilitar potencialmente una escalada de privilegios por medio de acceso local • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220210-0007 https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00527.html •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2022-23305 – SQL injection in JDBC Appender in Apache Log4j V1
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23305
By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/18/4 https://lists.apache.org/thread/pt6lh3pbsvxqlwlp4c5l798dv2hkc85y https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/index.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220217-0007 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-23305 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041959 • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0CVE-2022-23302 – Deserialization of untrusted data in JMSSink in Apache Log4j 1.x
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23302
JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/18/3 https://lists.apache.org/thread/bsr3l5qz4g0myrjhy9h67bcxodpkwj4w https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/index.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220217-0006 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-23302 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041949 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 10%CPEs: 35EXPL: 2CVE-2021-44790 – Possible buffer overflow when parsing multipart content in mod_lua of Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44790
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from Lua scripts). The Apache httpd team is not aware of an exploit for the vulnerabilty though it might be possible to craft one. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier. Un cuerpo de petición cuidadosamente diseñado puede causar un desbordamiento de búfer en el analizador multiparte mod_lua (r:parsebody() llamado desde scripts Lua). El equipo de Apache httpd no presenta constancia de que se presente una explotación para esta vulnerabilidad, aunque podría ser posible diseñar uno. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51193 https://github.com/nuPacaChi/-CVE-2021-44790 http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171631/Apache-2.4.x-Buffer-Overflow.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/20/4 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •