CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2023-23915 – curl: HSTS amnesia with --parallel
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-23915
A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability exists in curl <v7.88.0 that could cause HSTS functionality to behave incorrectly when multiple URLs are requested in parallel. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS instead of using an insecure clear-text HTTP step even when HTTP is provided in the URL. This HSTS mechanism would however surprisingly fail when multiple transfers are done in parallel as the HSTS cache file gets overwritten by the most recentlycompleted transfer. A later HTTP-only transfer to the earlier host name would then *not* get upgraded properly to HSTS. A flaw was found in the Curl package, where the HSTS mechanism could fail when multiple transfers are done in parallel, as the HSTS cache file gets overwritten by the most recently completed transfer. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1826048 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-12 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230309-0006 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-23915 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167813 • CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 1CVE-2023-23914 – curl: HSTS ignored on multiple requests
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-23914
A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability exists in curl <v7.88.0 that could cause HSTS functionality fail when multiple URLs are requested serially. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS instead of usingan insecure clear-text HTTP step even when HTTP is provided in the URL. ThisHSTS mechanism would however surprisingly be ignored by subsequent transferswhen done on the same command line because the state would not be properlycarried on. A flaw was found in the Curl package, where the HSTS mechanism would be ignored by subsequent transfers when done on the same command line because the state would not be properly carried. This issue may result in limited confidentiality and integrity. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1813864 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-12 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230309-0006 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-23914 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167797 • CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2022-40304 – libxml2: dict corruption caused by entity reference cycles
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-40304
An issue was discovered in libxml2 before 2.10.3. Certain invalid XML entity definitions can corrupt a hash table key, potentially leading to subsequent logic errors. In one case, a double-free can be provoked. Se descubrió un problema en libxml2 antes de la versión 2.10.3. Ciertas definiciones de entidades XML no válidas pueden dañar la clave de una tabla hash, lo que podría provocar errores lógicos posteriores. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/21 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/24 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/25 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/26 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/27 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/1b41ec4e9433b05bb0376be4725804c54ef1d80b https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/tags https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/tags/v2.10.3 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221209-0003 • CWE-415: Double Free •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2022-40303 – libxml2: integer overflows with XML_PARSE_HUGE
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-40303
An issue was discovered in libxml2 before 2.10.3. When parsing a multi-gigabyte XML document with the XML_PARSE_HUGE parser option enabled, several integer counters can overflow. This results in an attempt to access an array at a negative 2GB offset, typically leading to a segmentation fault. Se descubrió un problema en libxml2 antes de la versión 2.10.3. Al analizar un documento XML de varios gigabytes con la opción de analizador XML_PARSE_HUGE habilitada, varios contadores de enteros pueden desbordarse. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/21 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/24 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/25 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/26 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/27 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/c846986356fc149915a74972bf198abc266bc2c0 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/tags/v2.10.3 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221209-0003 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213531 https:/ • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 11%CPEs: 9EXPL: 4CVE-2022-3602 – X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-3602
A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. • https://github.com/colmmacc/CVE-2022-3602 https://github.com/eatscrayon/CVE-2022-3602-poc https://github.com/corelight/CVE-2022-3602 https://github.com/cybersecurityworks553/CVE-2022-3602-and-CVE-2022-3786 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169687/OpenSSL-Security-Advisory-20221101.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/15 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/16 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/17 http://www&# • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •