CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2015-8544
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8544
NetApp SnapDrive for Windows before 7.0.2P4, 7.0.3, and 7.1 before 7.1.3P1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. NetApp SnapDrive para Windows en versiones anteriores a 7.0.2P4, 7.0.3 y 7.1 en versiones anteriores a 7.1.3P1 permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible a través de vectores no especificados. • https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/cve-2015-8544-sensitive-information-disclosure-in-snapdrive-for-windows https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20160111-0001 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1CVE-2016-8610 – SSL/TLS: Malformed plain-text ALERT packets could cause remote DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8610
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 2CVE-2015-8960
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8960
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y versiones anteriores soporta los valores rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh y ecdsa_fixed_ecdh para ClientCertificateType pero no documenta directamente la habilidad para computar el secreto maestro en determinadas situaciones con una clave de cliente secreta y una clave pública de servidor pero no una clave secreta de servidor, lo que facilita a atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores TLS aprovechando el conocimiento de la clave secreta para un certificado cliente X.509 arbitrariamente instalado, también conocido como problema "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)". • http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071 https://kcitls.org https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002 https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •