Page 4 of 46 results (0.009 seconds)

CVSS: 4.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support. It considers CN even when there is a non-matching subjectAltName (SAN). This is fixed in, for example, openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. libldap en determinados paquetes OpenLDAP de terceros presenta un fallo de comprobación de certificados cuando el paquete de terceros está afirmando que admite RFC6125. Considera CN incluso cuando se presenta un subjectAltName (SAN) no coincidente. Esto es corregido, por ejemplo, en la versión openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 en Red Hat Enterprise • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00033.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00059.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3674 https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740070 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 9%CPEs: 67EXPL: 1

In filter.c in slapd in OpenLDAP before 2.4.50, LDAP search filters with nested boolean expressions can result in denial of service (daemon crash). En el archivo filter.c en slapd en OpenLDAP versiones anteriores a 2.4.50, los filtros de búsqueda de LDAP con expresiones booleanas anidadas pueden resultar en una denegación de servicio (bloqueo del demonio). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00016.html https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9202 https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4/CHANGES https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/commit/98464c11df8247d6a11b52e294ba5dd4f0380440 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00001.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200511-0003 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT211289 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4352-1 https&# • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues. •

CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) Se detectó un problema en el servidor en OpenLDAP anterior a versión 2.4.48. Cuando el administrador del servidor delega los privilegios de tipo rootDN (administrador de base de datos) para ciertas bases de datos, pero quiere mantener el aislamiento (por ejemplo, para implementaciones de múltiples inquilinos), slapd no detiene apropiadamente un rootDN de solicitar una autorización como una identidad de otra base de datos durante un enlace SASL o con un control proxyAuthz (RFC 4370). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/08/msg00024.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/23 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190822-0004 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT210788 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4 •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

contrib/slapd-modules/nops/nops.c in OpenLDAP through 2.4.45, when both the nops module and the memberof overlay are enabled, attempts to free a buffer that was allocated on the stack, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (slapd crash) via a member MODDN operation. contrib/slapd-modules/nops/nops.c en OpenLDAP hasta la versión 2.4.45, cuando el módulo nops y la capa memberof están activados, intenta liberar un búfer que se había asignado en la pila, lo que permite que los atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (cierre inesperado de slapd) mediante una operación member MODDN. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Incoming?id=8759 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •