Page 4 of 138 results (0.023 seconds)

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0

The get_client_master_key function in s2_srvr.c in the SSLv2 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a accepts a nonzero CLIENT-MASTER-KEY CLEAR-KEY-LENGTH value for an arbitrary cipher, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to determine the MASTER-KEY value and decrypt TLS ciphertext data by leveraging a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, a related issue to CVE-2016-0800. La función get_client_master_key en s2_srvr.c en la implementación de SSLv2 en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1m y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2a acepta un valor CLIENT-MASTER-KEY CLEAR-KEY-LENGTH distinto de cero para un cifrado arbitrario, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle determinar el valor MASTER-KEY y descifrar datos de texto cifrados con TLS aprovechándose de un Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, un caso relacionado con CVE-2016-0800. It was discovered that the SSLv2 servers using OpenSSL accepted SSLv2 connection handshakes that indicated non-zero clear key length for non-export cipher suites. An attacker could use this flaw to decrypt recorded SSLv2 sessions with the server by using it as a decryption oracle. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00007.h • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0

An oracle protection mechanism in the get_client_master_key function in s2_srvr.c in the SSLv2 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a overwrites incorrect MASTER-KEY bytes during use of export cipher suites, which makes it easier for remote attackers to decrypt TLS ciphertext data by leveraging a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, a related issue to CVE-2016-0800. Un mecanismo de protección oracle en la función get_client_master_key en s2_srvr.c en la implementación de SSLv2 en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1m y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2a sobrescribe MASTER-KEY bytes incorrectos durante el uso de suites de cifrado de exportación, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos el descifrado de datos de texto cifrados con TLS aprovechándose de un Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, un caso relacionado con CVE-2016-0800. It was discovered that the SSLv2 protocol implementation in OpenSSL did not properly implement the Bleichenbacher protection for export cipher suites. An attacker could use a SSLv2 server using OpenSSL as a Bleichenbacher oracle. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00007.h • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0

ssl/s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1p, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2d, when used for a multi-threaded client, writes the PSK identity hint to an incorrect data structure, which allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (race condition and double free) via a crafted ServerKeyExchange message. ssl/s3_clnt.c en OpenSSL 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1p y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2d, cuando es utilizado por un cliente multi hilo, escribe la pista de identidad PSK en una estructura de datos incorrecta, lo que permite a servidores remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (condición de carrera y liberación doble) a través de un mensaje ServerKeyExchange manipulado. A race condition flaw, leading to a double free, was found in the way OpenSSL handled pre-shared key (PSK) identify hints. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash a multi-threaded SSL/TLS client using OpenSSL. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00070.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00071.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145382583417444&w=2 http://openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txt • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0

The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application. La implementación ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE en crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1q y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2e no maneja correctamente los errores provocados por datos X509_ATTRIBUTE malformados, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible de memoria de proceso desencadenando un fallo de decodificación en una aplicación PKCS#7 o CMS. A memory leak vulnerability was found in the way OpenSSL parsed PKCS#7 and CMS data. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause an application that parses PKCS#7 or CMS data from untrusted sources to use an excessive amount of memory and possibly crash. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 29%CPEs: 46EXPL: 0

The X509_cmp_time function in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zg, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0s, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1n, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2b allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted length field in ASN1_TIME data, as demonstrated by an attack against a server that supports client authentication with a custom verification callback. La función X509_cmp_time en crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zg, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0s, 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1n, y 1.0.2 anterior a 1.0.2b permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (lectura fuera de rango y caída de aplicación) a través de un campo de longitud manipulado en datos ASN1_TIME, tal y como fue demostrado mediante un ataque sobre un servidor que soporta la autenticación de clientes con una rellamada de verificación personalizada. An out-of-bounds read flaw was found in the X509_cmp_time() function of OpenSSL, which is used to test the expiry dates of SSL/TLS certificates. An attacker could possibly use a specially crafted SSL/TLS certificate or CRL (Certificate Revocation List), which when parsed by an application would cause that application to crash. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-vulnerabilities-june-2015 http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10694 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/160436.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/160647.html http& • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •