CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 38EXPL: 18CVE-2020-1938 – Apache Tomcat Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1938
When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49039 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48143 https://github.com/sgdream/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/xindongzhuaizhuai/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/laolisafe/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/sv3nbeast/CVE-2020-1938-Tomact-file_include-file_read https://github.com/fairyming/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/dacade/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/Hancheng-Lei/Hacking-Vulnerability-CVE-2020-1938-Ghostcat https://github.com/w4fz5uck5& • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0CVE-2020-1935 – tomcat: Mishandling of Transfer-Encoding header allows for HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1935
In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. En Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.0.99, el código de análisis del encabezado HTTP utilizó un enfoque para el análisis de fin de línea que permitió a algunos encabezados HTTP no válidos ser analizados como válidos. Esto conllevó a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido en una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r127f76181aceffea2bd4711b03c595d0f115f63e020348fe925a916c%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r441c1f30a252bf14b07396286f6abd8089ce4240e91323211f1a2d75%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r660cd379afe346f10d72c0eaa8459ccc95d83aff181671b7e9076919%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17569 – tomcat: Regression in handling of Transfer-Encoding header allows for HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17569
The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. La refactorización presente en Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.28 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.48 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.98 hasta 7.0.99, introdujo una regresión. El resultado de la regresión fue que los encabezados Transfer-Encoding no válidos fueron procesados incorrectamente, conllevando a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido de una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r88def002c5c78534674ca67472e035099fbe088813d50062094a1390%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc31cbabb46cdc58bbdd8519a8f64b6236b2635a3922bbeba0f0e3743%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/03/msg00006.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory&# • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17563 – tomcat: Session fixation when using FORM authentication
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17563
When using FORM authentication with Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.29, 8.5.0 to 8.5.49 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.98 there was a narrow window where an attacker could perform a session fixation attack. The window was considered too narrow for an exploit to be practical but, erring on the side of caution, this issue has been treated as a security vulnerability. Cuando se usa la autenticación FORM con Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.29, 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.49 y 7.0.0 hasta 7.0.98, había una ventana estrecha donde un atacante podía llevar a cabo un ataque de fijación de sesión. La ventana fue considerada demasiado estrecha para que una explotación sea práctica, pero, por precaución, este problema ha sido tratado como una vulnerabilidad de seguridad. It was found that tomcat's FORM authentication allowed a very small period in which an attacker could possibly force a victim to use a valid user session, or Session Fixation. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00013.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8b4c1db8300117b28a0f3f743c0b9e3f964687a690cdf9662a884bbd%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3bbb800a816d0a51eccc5a228c58736960a9fffafa581a225834d97d%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r48c1444845fe15a823e1374674bfc297d5008a5453788099ea14caf0%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6ccee4e849bc77df0840c7f853f6bd09d426f6741247da2b7429d5d9%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https • CWE-384: Session Fixation •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 429EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10219 – hibernate-validator: safeHTML validator allows XSS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10219
A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. Una vulnerabilidad fue encontrada en Hibernate-Validator. La anotación del validador SafeHtml no puede sanear apropiadamente las cargas útiles que consisten en código potencialmente malicioso en los comentarios e instrucciones HTML. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0159 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0160 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0161 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0445 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10219 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4f8b4e2541be4234946e40d55859273a7eec0f4901e8080ce2406fe6%40%3Cnotifications.accumulo.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4f92d7f7682dcff92722fa947f9e6f8ba2227c5dc3e11ba0911 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •