Page 4 of 76 results (0.107 seconds)

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 147EXPL: 1

The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue. El protocolo SSL 3.0, utilizado en OpenSSL hasta 1.0.1i y otros productos, utiliza relleno (padding) CBC no determinístico, lo que facilita a los atacantes man-in-the-middle obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de relleno (padding) oracle, también conocido como el problema "POODLE". A flaw was found in the way SSL 3.0 handled padding bytes when decrypting messages encrypted using block ciphers in cipher block chaining (CBC) mode. This flaw allows a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacker to decrypt a selected byte of a cipher text in as few as 256 tries if they are able to force a victim application to repeatedly send the same data over newly created SSL 3.0 connections. • https://github.com/mikesplain/CVE-2014-3566-poodle-cookbook ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-015.txt.asc http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0416.html http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory11.asc http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0101.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0103.html http://askubuntu.com/questions/537196/how-do-i-patch-workaround-sslv3-poodle-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566 http& • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 89%CPEs: 345EXPL: 17

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. GNU Bash hasta 4.3 bash43-025 procesa cadenas finales después de la definición malformada de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos escribir hacia ficheros o posiblemente tener otro impacto desconocido a través de un entorno manipulado, tal y como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en la cual establecer el entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash. Nota: Esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2014-6271. It was found that the fix for CVE-2014-6271 was incomplete, and Bash still allowed certain characters to be injected into other environments via specially crafted environment variables. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34766 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35115 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36933 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34765 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34860 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34879 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 345EXPL: 53

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. GNU Bash hasta la versión 4.3 procesa cadenas finales después de las definiciones de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un entorno manipulado, tal como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en las cuales el ajuste de entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash, también conocido como "ShellShock." NOTA: la reparación original para este problema era incorrecta; CVE-2014-7169 ha sido asignada para cubrir la vulnerabilidad que todavía está presente después de la solución incorrecta. A flaw was found in the way Bash evaluated certain specially crafted environment variables. • https://github.com/darrenmartyn/visualdoor https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38849 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39918 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40619 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40938 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34900 https • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5 allow remote authenticated users to have unknown impact via (1) SYS.DBMS_PRVTAQIS in the Advanced Queuing component (DB02) and (2) MDSYS.MD in the Spatial component (DB12). NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that DB02 is for SQL injection and DB12 is for a buffer overflow. Múltiples vulnerabilidades no especificadas en Oracle Database versiones 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.7 y 10.1.0.5, permiten a usuarios autenticados remotoss tener un impacto desconocido por medio de (1) SYS.DBMS_PRVTAQIS en el componente Advanced Queuing (DB02) y (2) MDSYS.MD en el componente Spatial (DB12). NOTA: Oracle no ha cuestionado las afirmaciones de investigadores confiables de que DB02 es para una inyección SQL y DB12 para un desbordamiento de búfer. • http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=en&cc=us&objectID=c00727143 http://secunia.com/advisories/26114 http://secunia.com/advisories/26166 http://www.integrigy.com/security-resources/analysis/Integrigy_Oracle_CPU_July_2007_Analysis.pdf http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2007-087014.html http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_cpu_jul_2007.html http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_dbms_prvtaqis.html http://w •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 59%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Ingres database server 2006 9.0.4, r3, 2.6, and 2.5, as used in multiple CA (Computer Associates) products, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the (1) uuid_from_char or (2) duve_get_args functions. Múltiples desbordamientos de búfer en la región stack de la memoria en Ingres database server 2006 versiones 9.0.4, r3, 2.6 y 2.5, tal como se usa en varios productos de CA (Computer Associates), permiten a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de las funciones (1) uuid_from_char o (2) duve_get_args. Computer Associates Advantage Ingres version 2.6 suffers from multiple denial of service vulnerabilities. • http://osvdb.org/37483 http://secunia.com/advisories/25756 http://secunia.com/advisories/25775 http://supportconnectw.ca.com/public/ca_common_docs/ingresvuln_letter.asp http://www.ca.com/us/securityadvisor/newsinfo/collateral.aspx?cid=145778 http://www.ngssoftware.com/advisories/high-risk-vulnerability-in-ingres-stack-overflow http://www.ngssoftware.com/advisories/medium-risk-vulnerability-in-ingres-stack-overflow http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/472194/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfo • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •