CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 81EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1258 – spring-security-core: Unauthorized Access with Spring Security Method Security
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1258
Spring Framework version 5.0.5 when used in combination with any versions of Spring Security contains an authorization bypass when using method security. An unauthorized malicious user can gain unauthorized access to methods that should be restricted. La versión 5.0.5 de Spring Framework, cuando se utiliza en combinación con cualquier versión de Spring Security, contiene un omisión de autorización cuando se utiliza la seguridad del método. Un usuario malicioso no autorizado puede obtener acceso no autorizado a métodos que deben ser restringidos. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104222 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041888 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041896 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2413 https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1258 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181018-0002 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html https://www.oracle& • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 97%CPEs: 1467EXPL: 3CVE-2017-5753 – Multiple CPUs - 'Spectre' Information Disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5753
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. Los sistemas con microprocesadores con ejecución especulativa y predicción de ramas podrían permitir la revelación no autorizada de información al atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de un canal lateral. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). There are three primary variants of the issue which differ in the way the speculative execution can be exploited. Variant CVE-2017-5753 triggers the speculative execution by performing a bounds-check bypass. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43427 https://github.com/sachinthaBS/Spectre-Vulnerability-CVE-2017-5753- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00007.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00016.html http://nvidia.custhe • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2017-9735
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-9735
Jetty through 9.4.x is prone to a timing channel in util/security/Password.java, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access by observing elapsed times before rejection of incorrect passwords. Jetty hasta la versión 9.4.x es propenso a una sincronización de canal en util/security/Password.java, lo que facilita que atacantes remotos obtengan acceso observando el tiempo transcurrido antes de rechazar contraseñas incorrectas. SR 760 Feeder Protection Relay, en versiones de firmware anteriores a la 7.47; SR 469 Motor Protection Relay, en versiones de firmware anteriores a la 5.23; SR 489 Generator Protection Relay, en versiones de firmware anteriores a la 4.06; SR 745 Transformer Protection Relay, en versiones de firmware anteriores a la 5.23; SR 369 Motor Protection Relay, en todas las versiones de firmware; Multilin Universal Relay, en versiones de firmware 6.0 y anteriores; y Multilin URplus (D90, C90, B95), en todas las versiones. Las versiones en texto cifrado de contraseñas de usuario fueron creadas con un vector de inicialización no aleatorio, dejándolas expuestas a ataques de diccionario. El texto cifrado de las contraseñas de usuario se pueden obtener del panel LCD de los productos afectados y a través de los comandos Modbus enviados. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99104 https://bugs.debian.org/864631 https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/1556 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/36870f6c51f5bc25e6f7bb1fcace0e57e81f1524019b11f466738559%40%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/519eb0fd45642dcecd9ff74cb3e71c20a4753f7d82e2f07864b5108f%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f887a5978f5e • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1CVE-2017-5645 – log4j: Socket receiver deserialization vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5645
In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 46EXPL: 0CVE-2016-9843 – zlib: Big-endian out-of-bounds pointer
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9843
The crc32_big function in crc32.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving big-endian CRC calculation. La función crc32_big en crc32.c in zlib 1.2.8 podría permitir que atacantes dependientes del contexto causen impactos no especificados mediante vectores que implican cálculos CRC big-endian. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00127.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00050.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00053.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/05/21 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus •