CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 72EXPL: 1CVE-2021-41182 – XSS in the `altField` option of the Datepicker widget
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-41182
jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of the `altField` option of the Datepicker widget from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. Any string value passed to the `altField` option is now treated as a CSS selector. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `altField` option from untrusted sources. jQuery-UI es la biblioteca oficial de interfaz de usuario de jQuery. • https://blog.jqueryui.com/2021/10/jquery-ui-1-13-0-released https://github.com/jquery/jquery-ui/pull/1954/commits/6809ce843e5ac4128108ea4c15cbc100653c2b63 https://github.com/jquery/jquery-ui/security/advisories/GHSA-9gj3-hwp5-pmwc https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/01/msg00014.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00040.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HVKIOWSXL2RF2ULNAP7PHESYCFSZIJE3 https://lists.fedoraproj • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 54EXPL: 1CVE-2021-41183 – XSS in `*Text` options of the Datepicker widget
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-41183
jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of various `*Text` options of the Datepicker widget from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. The values passed to various `*Text` options are now always treated as pure text, not HTML. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `*Text` options from untrusted sources. jQuery-UI es la biblioteca oficial de interfaz de usuario de jQuery. • https://blog.jqueryui.com/2021/10/jquery-ui-1-13-0-released https://bugs.jqueryui.com/ticket/15284 https://github.com/jquery/jquery-ui/pull/1953 https://github.com/jquery/jquery-ui/security/advisories/GHSA-j7qv-pgf6-hvh4 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/01/msg00014.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00040.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HVKIOWSXL2RF2ULNAP7PHESYCFSZIJE3 https://list • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 10EXPL: 28CVE-2021-42013 – Apache HTTP Server Path Traversal Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-42013
It was found that the fix for CVE-2021-41773 in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.50 was insufficient. An attacker could use a path traversal attack to map URLs to files outside the directories configured by Alias-like directives. If files outside of these directories are not protected by the usual default configuration "require all denied", these requests can succeed. If CGI scripts are also enabled for these aliased pathes, this could allow for remote code execution. This issue only affects Apache 2.4.49 and Apache 2.4.50 and not earlier versions. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50406 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50446 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50512 https://github.com/andrea-mattioli/apache-exploit-CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/asaotomo/CVE-2021-42013-Apache-RCE-Poc-Exp https://github.com/BassoNicolas/CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/TheLastVvV/CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/rafifdna/CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/rnsss/CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/LayarKacaSiber/CVE-2021-42013 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3712 – Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3712
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/26/2 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-244969.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=94d23fcff9b2a7a8368dfe52214d5c2569882c11 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=ccb0a11145ee72b042d10593a64eaf9e8a55ec12 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18995de860f0e63635f3008f • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 6%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3711 – SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3711
In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/26/2 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=59f5e75f3bced8fc0e130d72a3f582cf7b480b46 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18995de860f0e63635f3008fd2a6aca82394249476d21691e7c59c9e%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rad5d9f83f0d11fb3f8bb148d179b8a9ad7c6a17f18d70e5805a713d1%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-02 https://security.ge • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •