CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2018-11056
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-11056
RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, prior to 4.1.6.1 (in 4.1.x), and RSA BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition versions prior to 4.0.5.3 (in 4.0.x) contain an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption ('Resource Exhaustion') vulnerability when parsing ASN.1 data. A remote attacker could use maliciously constructed ASN.1 data that would exhaust the stack, potentially causing a Denial Of Service. RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, en versiones anteriores a la 4.1.6.1 (en las 4.1.x) y RSA BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition en versiones anteriores a la 4.0.5.3 (en las 4.0.x) contiene una vulnerabilidad de consumo de recursos no controlado ("Resource Exhaustion") al analizar datos ASN.1. Un atacante remoto podría emplear datos ASN.1 construidos de forma maliciosa que agotarían la pila, pudiendo provocar una denegación de servicio (DoS). • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Aug/46 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2018-11057
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-11057
RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 4.0.11 (in 4.0.x) and prior to 4.1.6.1 (in 4.1.x) contains a Covert Timing Channel vulnerability during RSA decryption, also known as a Bleichenbacher attack on RSA decryption. A remote attacker may be able to recover a RSA key. RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, en versiones anteriores a la 4.0.11 (en las 4.0.x) y anteriores a la 4.1.6.1 (en las 4.1.x) contiene una vulnerabilidad de canal de tiempo oculto durante el descifrado RSA. Esto también se conoce como ataque Bleichenbacher sobre descifrado RSA. Un atacante remoto podría ser capaz de recuperar una clave RSA. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Aug/46 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1288 – kafka: Users can perform Broker actions via crafted fetch requests, interfering with data replication and causing data lass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1288
In Apache Kafka 0.9.0.0 to 0.9.0.1, 0.10.0.0 to 0.10.2.1, 0.11.0.0 to 0.11.0.2, and 1.0.0, authenticated Kafka users may perform action reserved for the Broker via a manually created fetch request interfering with data replication, resulting in data loss. En Apache Kafka desde la versión 0.9.0.0.0 hasta la 0.9.0.1, desde la 0.10.0.0 hasta la 0.10.2.1, desde la 0.11.0.0.0 hasta la 0.11.0.2 y en la versión 1.0.0.0, los usuarios autenticados de Kafka pueden realizar acciones reservadas para el Broker a través de una petición fetch creada manualmente que interfiere con la replicación de datos, lo que provoca la pérdida de datos. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104900 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3768 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/29f61337323f48c47d4b41d74b9e452bd60e65d0e5103af9a6bb2fef%40%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/519eb0fd45642dcecd9ff74cb3e71c20a4753f7d82e2f07864b5108f%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b0656d359c7d40ec9f39c8cc61bca66802ef9a2a12ee199f5b0c1442%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1581fb6464c9bec8a72575c01f5097d68e2fbb230aff24622622a58%40%3Ccommits.kafka.apac • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1CVE-2017-5645 – log4j: Socket receiver deserialization vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5645
In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1CVE-2016-8610 – SSL/TLS: Malformed plain-text ALERT packets could cause remote DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8610
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •