CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3632 – libtiff: out-of-bounds write in _TIFFVGetField function
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3632
The _TIFFVGetField function in tif_dirinfo.c in LibTIFF 4.0.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image. La función _TIFFVGetField en tif_dirinfo.c en LibTIFF 4.0.6 y versiones anteriores permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (escritura fuera de límites) o ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una imagen TIFF manipulada. • http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2549 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1546.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1547.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/08/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinjul2016-3090546.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/85953 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/85960 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug&# • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5403 – Qemu: virtio: unbounded memory allocation on host via guest leading to DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5403
The virtqueue_pop function in hw/virtio/virtio.c in QEMU allows local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and QEMU process crash) by submitting requests without waiting for completion. La función virtqueue_pop en hw/virtio/virtio.c en QEMU permite a administradores locales del SO invitado provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria y caida del proceso QUEMU) mediante la presentación de solicitudes sin esperar la finalización. Quick Emulator (QEMU) built with the virtio framework is vulnerable to an unbounded memory allocation issue. It was found that a malicious guest user could submit more requests than the virtqueue size permits. Processing a request allocates a VirtQueueElement results in unbounded memory allocation on the host controlled by the guest. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1585.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1586.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1606.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1607.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1652.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1653.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1654.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1655.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1756.html http://rhn • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4470 – kernel: Uninitialized variable in request_key handling causes kernel crash in error handling path
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4470
The key_reject_and_link function in security/keys/key.c in the Linux kernel through 4.6.3 does not ensure that a certain data structure is initialized, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (system crash) via vectors involving a crafted keyctl request2 command. La función key_reject_and_link en security/keys/key.c en el kernel de Linux hasta la versión 4.6.3 no asegura que cierta estructura de datos esté inicializada, lo que permite a usuarios locales provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del sistema) a través de vectores involucrando un comando keyctl request2 manipulado. A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's keyring handling code: the key_reject_and_link() function could be forced to free an arbitrary memory block. An attacker could use this flaw to trigger a use-after-free condition on the system, potentially allowing for privilege escalation. • http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=38327424b40bcebe2de92d07312c89360ac9229a http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00007.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org • CWE-253: Incorrect Check of Function Return Value •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4962
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4962
The libxl device-handling in Xen 4.6.x and earlier allows local OS guest administrators to cause a denial of service (resource consumption or management facility confusion) or gain host OS privileges by manipulating information in guest controlled areas of xenstore. libxl device-handling en Xen 4.6.x y versiones anteriores permite a administradores locales invitados de SO provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de recurso o confusión de facilidad de gestión) u obtener privilegios de anfitrión de SO manipulando información en áreas controladas por invitado de xenstore. • http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3633 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinjul2016-3090546.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91006 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036023 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-175.html • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 1CVE-2016-4447 – libxml2: Heap-based buffer underreads due to xmlParseName
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4447
The xmlParseElementDecl function in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.4 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer underread and application crash) via a crafted file, involving xmlParseName. La función xmlParseElementDecl en parser.c en libxml2 en versiones anteriores a 2.9.4 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (underread basado en memoria dinámica y caída de aplicación) a través de un archivo manipulado, con la participación de xmlParseName. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00002.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00003.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00005.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/25/2 http://www • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •