CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2016-6325 – tomcat: tomcat writable config files allow privilege escalation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-6325
The Tomcat package on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5 through 7, JBoss Web Server 3.0, and JBoss EWS 2 uses weak permissions for (1) /etc/sysconfig/tomcat and (2) /etc/tomcat/tomcat.conf, which allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging membership in the tomcat group. El paquete Tomcat en Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5 hasta la versión 7, JBoss Web Server 3.0 y JBoss EWS 2 utiliza permisos débiles para (1) /etc/sysconfig/tomcat y (2) /etc/tomcat/tomcat.conf, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener privilegios aprovechando su pertenencia al grupo tomcat. It was discovered that the Tomcat packages installed certain configuration files read by the Tomcat initialization script as writeable to the tomcat group. A member of the group or a malicious web application deployed on Tomcat could use this flaw to escalate their privileges. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2045.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2046.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0457.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0456 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367447 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6325 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7166 – libarchive: Denial of service using a crafted gzip file
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7166
libarchive before 3.2.0 does not limit the number of recursive decompressions, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and application crash) via a crafted gzip file. libarchive en versiones anteriores a 3.2.0 no limita el número de descompresiones recursivas, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria y caída de aplicación) a través de un archivo gzip manipulado. A vulnerability was found in libarchive. A specially crafted gzip file can cause libarchive to allocate memory without limit, eventually leading to a crash. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1844.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1850.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/08/15 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/08/18 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92901 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207362 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347086 https://github.com/libarchiv • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 3CVE-2016-5418 – libarchive: Archive Entry with type 1 (hardlink), but has a non-zero data size file overwrite
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5418
The sandboxing code in libarchive 3.2.0 and earlier mishandles hardlink archive entries of non-zero data size, which might allow remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a crafted archive file. El código sandboxing en libarchive 3.2.0 y versiones anteriores no maneja adecuadamente entradas de archivo de vínculo físico de datos de tamaño distinto de cero, lo que podría permitir a atacantes remotos escribir a archivos arbitrarios a través de un archivo manipulado. A flaw was found in the way libarchive handled hardlink archive entries of non-zero size. Combined with flaws in libarchive's file system sandboxing, this issue could cause an application using libarchive to overwrite arbitrary files with arbitrary data from the archive. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1844.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1850.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/08/09/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93165 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1852 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1853 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362601 https://gist.github.com/anonymous/e48209b03f1dd9625a992717e7b8 • CWE-19: Data Processing Errors CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 94%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5388 – Tomcat: CGI sets environmental variable based on user supplied Proxy request header
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5388
Apache Tomcat 7.x through 7.0.70 and 8.x through 8.5.4, when the CGI Servlet is enabled, follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "A mitigation is planned for future releases of Tomcat, tracked as CVE-2016-5388"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. Apache Tomcat, en versiones 7.x hasta la 7.0.70 y versiones 8.x hasta la 8.5.4, cuando el Servlet CGI está habilitado, sigue la sección 4.1.18 de RFC 3875 y, por lo tanto, no protege aplicaciones ante la presencia de datos de cliente no fiables en la variable de entorno HTTP_PROXY. Esto podría permitir que atacantes remotos redirijan el tráfico HTTP saliente de una aplicación a un servidor proxy arbitrario mediante una cabecera Proxy manipulada en una petición HTTP. Esto también se conoce como problema "httpoxy". • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-09/msg00025.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1624.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2045.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2046.html http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91818 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 8EXPL: 2CVE-2016-4302 – libarchive: Heap buffer overflow in the Rar decompression functionality
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4302
Heap-based buffer overflow in the parse_codes function in archive_read_support_format_rar.c in libarchive before 3.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a RAR file with a zero-sized dictionary. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica en la función parse_codes en archive_read_support_format_rar.c en libarchive en versiones anteriores a 3.2.1 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un archivo RAR con un diccionario de tamaño cero. A vulnerability was found in libarchive's handling of RAR archives. A specially crafted RAR file can cause a heap overflow, potentially leading to code execution in the context of the application. • http://blog.talosintel.com/2016/06/the-poisoned-archives.html http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1348444 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1844.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3657 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91331 http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0154 https://github.com/liba • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •