Page 4 of 128 results (0.016 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 32%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

It was found that ceph-isci-cli package as shipped by Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 and 3 is using python-werkzeug in debug shell mode. This is done by setting debug=True in file /usr/bin/rbd-target-api provided by ceph-isci-cli package. This allows unauthenticated attackers to access this debug shell and escalate privileges. Once an attacker has successfully connected to this debug shell they will be able to execute arbitrary commands remotely. These commands will run with the same privileges as of user executing the application which is using python-werkzeug with debug shell mode enabled. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105434 https://access.redhat.com/articles/3623521 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2837 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2838 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14649 https://github.com/ceph/ceph-iscsi-cli/issues/120 https://github.com/ceph/ceph-iscsi-cli/pull/121/commits/c3812075e30c76a800a961e7291087d357403f6b https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-14649 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id= • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in RPC request using gfs3_symlink_req in glusterfs server which allows symlink destinations to point to file paths outside of the gluster volume. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw to create arbitrary symlinks pointing anywhere on the server and execute arbitrary code on glusterfs server nodes. Se ha detectado un error en las peticiones RPC que emplean gfs3_symlink_req en el servidor glusterfs, lo que permite que los destinos symlink señalen a rutas de archivo fuera del volumen gluster. Un atacante autenticado podría emplear este error para crear symlinks arbitrarios que señalen a cualquier lugar del servidor y ejecutar código arbitrario en un nodo del servidor glusterfs. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00035.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2607 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2608 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3470 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10928 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00021.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00000.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201904-06 https://access.redhat.c • CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in ansible. ansible.cfg is read from the current working directory which can be altered to make it point to a plugin or a module path under the control of an attacker, thus allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code. Se ha encontrado un error en ansible. ansible.cfg se lee desde el directorio de trabajo actual, que puede alterarse para hacer que señale a un plugin o una ruta de módulo bajo el control de un atacante, permitiendo que el atacante ejecute código arbitrario. It was found that ansible.cfg is being read from the current working directory, which can be made to point to plugin or module paths that are under control of the attacker. This could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00021.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041396 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3788 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2150 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2151 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2152 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2166 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2321 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2585 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 5

A statement in the System Programming Guide of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (SDM) was mishandled in the development of some or all operating-system kernels, resulting in unexpected behavior for #DB exceptions that are deferred by MOV SS or POP SS, as demonstrated by (for example) privilege escalation in Windows, macOS, some Xen configurations, or FreeBSD, or a Linux kernel crash. The MOV to SS and POP SS instructions inhibit interrupts (including NMIs), data breakpoints, and single step trap exceptions until the instruction boundary following the next instruction (SDM Vol. 3A; section 6.8.3). (The inhibited data breakpoints are those on memory accessed by the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction itself.) Note that debug exceptions are not inhibited by the interrupt enable (EFLAGS.IF) system flag (SDM Vol. 3A; section 2.3). If the instruction following the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction is an instruction like SYSCALL, SYSENTER, INT 3, etc. that transfers control to the operating system at CPL < 3, the debug exception is delivered after the transfer to CPL < 3 is complete. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44697 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45024 https://github.com/can1357/CVE-2018-8897 https://github.com/nmulasmajic/CVE-2018-8897 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d8ba61ba58c88d5207c1ba2f7d9a2280e7d03be9 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/1 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/4 http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20190921-01-debug-en http: • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 76%CPEs: 70EXPL: 4

Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. Spring Framework, en versiones 5.0 anteriores a la 5.0.5 y versiones 4.3 anteriores a la 4.3.15, así como versiones más antiguas no soportadas, permite que las aplicaciones expongan STOMP en endpoints WebSocket con un simple agente STOMP en memoria a través del módulo spring-messaging. Un usuario (o atacante) malicioso puede manipular un mensaje al agente que desemboca en un ataque de ejecución remota de código. Pivotal Spring Java Framework versions 5.0.x and below suffer from a remote code execution vulnerability. • https://github.com/CaledoniaProject/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/Venscor/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/tafamace/CVE-2018-1270 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103696 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2939 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed49b103f64a0cecb38064f26cbf1389afc12124653da2d35166dbe%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •