Page 4 of 54 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0

The do_get_mempolicy function in mm/mempolicy.c in the Linux kernel before 4.12.9 allows local users to cause a denial of service (use-after-free) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted system calls. La función do_get_mempolicy en mm/mempolicy.c en el kernel de Linux, en versiones anteriores a la 4.12.9, permite que los usuarios locales provoquen una denegación de servicio (uso de memoria previamente liberada) o, posiblemente, causen otros impactos no especificados mediante llamadas del sistema manipuladas. The do_get_mempolicy() function in mm/mempolicy.c in the Linux kernel allows local users to hit a use-after-free bug via crafted system calls and thus cause a denial of service (DoS) or possibly have unspecified other impact. Due to the nature of the flaw, privilege escalation cannot be fully ruled out. • http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=73223e4e2e3867ebf033a5a8eb2e5df0158ccc99 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104093 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2384 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2395 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2785 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2791 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2924 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018& • CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0

GNU Patch version 2.7.6 contains an input validation vulnerability when processing patch files, specifically the EDITOR_PROGRAM invocation (using ed) can result in code execution. This attack appear to be exploitable via a patch file processed via the patch utility. This is similar to FreeBSD's CVE-2015-1418 however although they share a common ancestry the code bases have diverged over time. La versión 2.7.6 de GNU Patch contiene una vulnerabilidad de validación de entradas al procesar archivos patch; específicamente la invocación EDITOR_PROGRAM (usando ed) puede resultar en la ejecución de código. el ataque parece ser explotable mediante un archivo patch procesado mediante la utilidad patch. Esto es similar al CVE-2015-1418 de FreeBSD: aunque comparten un ancestro común, las bases de código han divergido con el tiempo. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154124/GNU-patch-Command-Injection-Directory-Traversal.html http://rachelbythebay.com/w/2018/04/05/bangpatch https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1199 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1200 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2091 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2092 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2093 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2094 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2095 ht • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 39%CPEs: 25EXPL: 3

rsyslog librelp version 1.2.14 and earlier contains a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the checking of x509 certificates from a peer that can result in Remote code execution. This attack appear to be exploitable a remote attacker that can connect to rsyslog and trigger a stack buffer overflow by sending a specially crafted x509 certificate. rsyslog librelp en versiones 1.2.14 y anteriores contiene una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de búfer en la verificación de certificados x509 desde un peer que puede resultar en la ejecución remota de código. Parece que este ataque puede ser explotable debido a que un atacante remoto puede conectarse a rsyslog y desencadena un desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila mediante el envío de un certificado x509 especialmente manipulado. A stack-based buffer overflow was found in the way librelp parses X.509 certificates. By connecting or accepting connections from a remote peer, an attacker may use a specially crafted X.509 certificate to exploit this flaw and potentially execute arbitrary code. • https://github.com/s0/rsyslog-librelp-CVE-2018-1000140 https://github.com/s0/rsyslog-librelp-CVE-2018-1000140-fixed http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/172829/librelp-Remote-Code-Execution.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1223 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1225 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1701 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1702 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1703 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1704 • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 23EXPL: 2

transport.py in the SSH server implementation of Paramiko before 1.17.6, 1.18.x before 1.18.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, 2.1.x before 2.1.5, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.2, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests, as demonstrated by channel-open. A customized SSH client can simply skip the authentication step. transport.py en la implementación del servidor SSH de Paramiko, en versiones anteriores a la 1.17.6; versiones 1.18.x anteriores a la 1.18.5; versiones 2.0.x anteriores a la 2.0.8; versiones 2.1.x anteriores a la 2.1.5; versiones 2.2.x anteriores a la 2.2.3; versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.2 y versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.1, no comprueba adecuadamente si la autenticación se ha completado antes de procesar otras peticiones, tal y como demuestra channel-open. Un cliente SSH personalizado puede simplemente omitir el paso de autenticación. It was found that when acting as an SSH server, paramiko did not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests. A customized SSH client could use this to bypass authentication when accessing any resources controlled by paramiko. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45712 https://github.com/jm33-m0/CVE-2018-7750 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103713 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0646 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1124 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1213 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1274 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1328 https:&#x • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 5%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0

BIND was improperly sequencing cleanup operations on upstream recursion fetch contexts, leading in some cases to a use-after-free error that can trigger an assertion failure and crash in named. Affects BIND 9.0.0 to 9.8.x, 9.9.0 to 9.9.11, 9.10.0 to 9.10.6, 9.11.0 to 9.11.2, 9.9.3-S1 to 9.9.11-S1, 9.10.5-S1 to 9.10.6-S1, 9.12.0a1 to 9.12.0rc1. BIND secuenciaba incorrectamente las operaciones de limpieza en contextos fetch de recursión ascendente, lo que conduce en algunos casos a un error de uso de memoria previamente liberada que puede desencadenar un fallo de aserción y un cierre inesperado en named. Afecta a BIND desde la versión 9.0.0 hasta la versión 9.8.x, desde la versión 9.9.0 hasta la versión 9.9.11, desde la versión 9.10.0 hasta la versión 9.10.6, desde la versión 9.11.0 hasta la versión 9.11.2, desde la versión 9.9.3-S1 hasta la versión 09.9.11-S1, desde la versión 9.10.5-S1 hasta la versión 9.10.6-S1 y desde la 9.12.0a1 hasta la 9.12.0rc1. A use-after-free flaw leading to denial of service was found in the way BIND internally handled cleanup operations on upstream recursion fetch contexts. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102716 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040195 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0101 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0102 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0487 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0488 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01542 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/01/msg00029.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180117-0003 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/ • CWE-416: Use After Free •