Page 4 of 32 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12150 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. Se descubrió que la solución para CVE-2017-12150 no se subió correctamente en la errata RHSA-2017:2858 para Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 para RHEL 6. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101554 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3110 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-15085 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15085 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505787 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12151 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. Se descubrió que la solución para CVE-2017-12151 no se subió correctamente en la errata RHSA-2017:2858 para Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 para RHEL 6. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101555 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3110 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-15086 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15086 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505785 • CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12163 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. Se descubrió que la solución para CVE-2017-12163 no se subió correctamente en la errata RHSA-2017:2858 para Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 para RHEL 6. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101556 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3110 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-15087 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15087 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505788 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

It was found that samba before 4.4.16, 4.5.x before 4.5.14, and 4.6.x before 4.6.8 did not enforce "SMB signing" when certain configuration options were enabled. A remote attacker could launch a man-in-the-middle attack and retrieve information in plain-text. Se ha descubierto que Samba en versiones anteriores a la 4.4.16, versiones 4.5.x anteriores a la 4.5.14 y versiones 4.6.x anteriores a la 4.6.8 no cumple "SMB signing" cuando están habilitadas determinadas opciones de configuración. Un atacante remoto podría lanzar un ataque Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) y recuperar información en texto plano. It was found that samba did not enforce "SMB signing" when certain configuration options were enabled. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100918 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039401 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2790 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2791 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2858 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-12150 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbns03775en_us https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170 • CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 53%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

An information leak flaw was found in the way SMB1 protocol was implemented by Samba before 4.4.16, 4.5.x before 4.5.14, and 4.6.x before 4.6.8. A malicious client could use this flaw to dump server memory contents to a file on the samba share or to a shared printer, though the exact area of server memory cannot be controlled by the attacker. Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad de fuga de información en la manera en la que Samba, en versiones anteriores a la 4.4.16, versiones 4.5.x anteriores a la 4.5.14 y versiones 4.6.x anteriores a la 4.6.8, implementó el protocolo SMB1. Un cliente malicioso podría utilizar esta vulnerabilidad para volcar los contenidos de la memoria del servidor en un archivo en el almacenamiento de samba o en una impresora compartida, aunque el atacante no pueda controlar el área exacta de memoria del servidor. An information leak flaw was found in the way SMB1 protocol was implemented by Samba. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100925 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039401 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2790 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2791 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2858 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-12163 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbns03775en_us https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •