Page 4 of 38 results (0.021 seconds)

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The Management Console in Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform before 6.4.4 and WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) does not send an X-Frame-Options HTTP header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page that contains a (1) FRAME or (2) IFRAME element. Management Console en Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform en versiones anteriores a 6.4.4 y WildFly (anteriormente JBoss Application Server) no envía una cabecera HTTP X-Frame-Options, lo que hace más fácil para atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de secuestro de click a través de una página web manipulada que contiene un elemento (1) FRAME o (2) IFRAME. It was discovered that the EAP Management Console could be opened in an IFRAME, which made it possible to intercept and manipulate requests. An attacker could use this flaw to trick a user into performing arbitrary actions in the Console (clickjacking). • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1904.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1905.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1906.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1907.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1908.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033859 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250552 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5178 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Web Console (web-console) in Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform before 6.4.4 and WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) before 2.0.0.CR9 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make arbitrary changes to an instance via vectors involving a file upload using a multipart/form-data submission. Vulnerabilidad de CSRF en la Web Console (web-console) en Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform en versiones anteriores a 6.4.4 y WildFly (anteriormente JBoss Application Server) en versiones anteriores a 2.0.0.CR9 permite a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticación de los administradores para solicitudes que realizan cambios arbitrarios en una instancia a través de vectores que involucran una carga de archivo utilizando un envío de datos multipart/form-data. It was discovered that when uploading a file using a multipart/form-data submission to the EAP Web Console, the Console was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). This meant that an attacker could use the flaw together with a forgery attack to make changes to an authenticated instance. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1904.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1905.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1906.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1907.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1908.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033859 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252885 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-594 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5188 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The Web Console in Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.4.4 and WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large request header. Web Console en Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) en versiones anteriores a 6.4.4 y WildFly (anteriormente JBoss Application Server) permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de la memoria) a través de una cabecera de petición grande. It was discovered that sending requests containing large headers to the Web Console produced a Java OutOfMemoryError in the HTTP management interface. An attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1904.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1905.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1906.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1907.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1908.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1519.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033859 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255597 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5220 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 2.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

The default configuration for the Command Line Interface in Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform before 6.4.0 and WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) uses weak permissions for .jboss-cli-history, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. La configuración por defecto para la interfaz de la línea de comandos en Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform anterior a 6.4.0 y WildFly (anteriormente JBoss Application Server) utiliza permisos débiles para .jboss-cli-history, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener información sensible a través de vectores no especificados. It was found that the Command Line Interface, as provided by Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform, created a history file named .jboss-cli-history in the user's home directory with insecure default file permissions. This could allow a malicious local user to gain information otherwise not accessible to them. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032183 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126687 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3586 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource •

CVSS: 3.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

The org.jboss.security.plugins.mapping.JBossMappingManager implementation in JBoss Security in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.3.3 uses the default security domain when a security domain is undefined, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging credentials on the default domain for a role that is also on the application domain. La implementación org.jboss.security.plugins.mapping.JBossMappingManager en JBoss Security en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) anterior a 6.3.3 utiliza el dominio de seguridad por defecto cuando un dominio de seguridad no está definido, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados evadir las restricciones de acceso mediante el aprovechamiento de las credenciales en el dominio por defecto para un rol que también está en el dominio de la aplicación. It was found that when processing undefined security domains, the org.jboss.security.plugins.mapping.JBossMappingManager implementation would fall back to the default security domain if it was available. A user with valid credentials in the defined default domain, with a role that is valid in the expected application domain, could perform actions that were otherwise not available to them. When using the SAML2 STS Login Module, JBossMappingManager exposed this issue due to the PicketLink Trust SecurityActions implementation using a hardcoded default value when defining the context. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0215.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0216.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0217.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0218.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0850.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0851.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031741 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100889 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7827 https://bugzilla.red • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •