CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10855 – ansible: Failed tasks do not honour no_log option allowing for secrets to be disclosed in logs
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10855
Ansible 2.5 prior to 2.5.5, and 2.4 prior to 2.4.5, do not honor the no_log task flag for failed tasks. When the no_log flag has been used to protect sensitive data passed to a task from being logged, and that task does not run successfully, Ansible will expose sensitive data in log files and on the terminal of the user running Ansible. Ansible, en versiones 2.5 anteriores a la 2.5.5 y 2.4 anteriores a la 2.4.5, no cumplen con la marca de tarea no_log para las tareas fallidas. Cuando se ha empleado la marca no_log para proteger datos sensibles que se pasan a una tarea desde que se registra y esa tarea no se ejecuta con éxito, Ansible mostrará datos sensibles en archivos de registro y en el terminal del usuario que ejecuta Ansible. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3788 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1949 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2022 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2079 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2184 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2585 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0054 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10855 https://usn.ubuntu.com/ • CWE-532: Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 95%CPEs: 66EXPL: 0CVE-2017-18017 – kernel: netfilter: use-after-free in tcpmss_mangle_packet function in net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-18017
The tcpmss_mangle_packet function in net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c in the Linux kernel before 4.11, and 4.9.x before 4.9.36, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free and memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging the presence of xt_TCPMSS in an iptables action. La función tcpmss_mangle_packet en net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c en el kernel de Linux, en versiones anteriores a la 4.11 y en versiones 4.9.x anteriores a la 4.9.36, permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (uso de memoria previamente liberada y corrupción de memoria) o, posiblemente, otro tipo de impacto sin especificar aprovechando la presencia de xt_TCPMSS en una acción iptables. The tcpmss_mangle_packet function in net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c in the Linux kernel before 4.11, and 4.9.x before 4.9.36, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free and memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging the presence of xt_TCPMSS in an iptables action. Due to the nature of the flaw, privilege escalation cannot be fully ruled out, although we believe it is unlikely. • http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2638fd0f92d4397884fd991d8f4925cb3f081901 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 85EXPL: 0CVE-2017-13078 – wpa_supplicant: Reinstallation of the group key in the 4-way handshake
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-13078
Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA and WPA2) allows reinstallation of the Group Temporal Key (GTK) during the four-way handshake, allowing an attacker within radio range to replay frames from access points to clients. Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA y WPA2) permite la reinstalación de la clave temporal GTK (Group Temporal Key) durante la negociación en cuatro pasos, haciendo que un atacante en el rango de radio reproduzca frames desde los puntos de acceso hasta los clientes. A new exploitation technique called key reinstallation attacks (KRACK) affecting WPA2 has been discovered. A remote attacker within Wi-Fi range could exploit this attack to decrypt Wi-Fi traffic or possibly inject forged Wi-Fi packets by reinstalling a previously used group key (GTK) during a 4-way handshake. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00024.html http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2017-007.txt http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3999 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/228519 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-a • CWE-323: Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 85EXPL: 0CVE-2017-13084
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-13084
Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA and WPA2) allows reinstallation of the Station-To-Station-Link (STSL) Transient Key (STK) during the PeerKey handshake, allowing an attacker within radio range to replay, decrypt, or spoof frames. Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA y WPA2) permite la reinstalación de la clave STK (Transient Key) STSL (Station-To-Station-Link) durante la negociación PeerKey, haciendo que un atacante que se sitúe dentro del radio reproduzca, descifre o suplante frames. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2017-007.txt http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/228519 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101274 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039576 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039577 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039581 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/kracks https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-901333.pdf https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-03 https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_secur • CWE-323: Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values •