CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16396 – ruby: Tainted flags are not propagated in Array#pack and String#unpack with some directives
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16396
An issue was discovered in Ruby before 2.3.8, 2.4.x before 2.4.5, 2.5.x before 2.5.2, and 2.6.x before 2.6.0-preview3. It does not taint strings that result from unpacking tainted strings with some formats. Se ha descubierto un problema en Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.3.8, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.5, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.2 y versiones 2.6.x anteriores a la 2.6.0-preview3. No contamina las cadenas que resultan de desempaquetar cadenas contaminadas con algunos formatos. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042106 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://hackerone.com/reports/385070 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00020.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190221-0002 https://usn • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16395 – ruby: OpenSSL::X509:: Name equality check does not work correctly
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16395
An issue was discovered in the OpenSSL library in Ruby before 2.3.8, 2.4.x before 2.4.5, 2.5.x before 2.5.2, and 2.6.x before 2.6.0-preview3. When two OpenSSL::X509::Name objects are compared using ==, depending on the ordering, non-equal objects may return true. When the first argument is one character longer than the second, or the second argument contains a character that is one less than a character in the same position of the first argument, the result of == will be true. This could be leveraged to create an illegitimate certificate that may be accepted as legitimate and then used in signing or encryption operations. Se ha descubierto un problema en la biblioteca OpenSSL en Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.3.8, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.5, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.2 y versiones 2.6.x anteriores a la 2.6.0-preview3. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042105 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3738 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2565 https://hackerone.com/reports/387250 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-8779 – ruby: Unintentional socket creation by poisoned NULL byte in UNIXServer and UNIXSocket
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8779
In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, the UNIXServer.open and UNIXSocket.open methods are not checked for null characters. It may be connected to an unintended socket. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, los métodos UNIXServer.open y UNIXSocket.open no se comprueban en busca de caracteres null. Podría estar relacionado con un socket no planeado. It was found that the UNIXSocket::open and UNIXServer::open ruby methods did not handle the NULL byte properly. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103767 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00024.html& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte) •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-8780 – ruby: Unintentional directory traversal by poisoned NULL byte in Dir
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8780
In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, the Dir.open, Dir.new, Dir.entries and Dir.empty? methods do not check NULL characters. When using the corresponding method, unintentional directory traversal may be performed. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, los métodos Dir.open, Dir.new, Dir.entries y Dir.empty? no comprueban los caracteres NULL. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103739 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0542 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata&#x • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2017-17742 – ruby: HTTP response splitting in WEBrick
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-17742
Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1 allows an HTTP Response Splitting attack. An attacker can inject a crafted key and value into an HTTP response for the HTTP server of WEBrick. Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, permite un ataque de separación de respuesta HTTP. Un atacante puede inyectar una clave y un valor manipulados en una respuesta HTTP para el servidor HTTP de WEBrick. It was found that WEBrick did not sanitize headers sent back to clients, resulting in a response-splitting vulnerability. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103684 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00024.html& • CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •