Page 4 of 32 results (0.007 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, an attacker controlling the unpacking format (similar to format string vulnerabilities) can trigger a buffer under-read in the String#unpack method, resulting in a massive and controlled information disclosure. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, un atacante que controla el formato de desempaquetado (similar a las vulnerabilidades de cadena de formato) puede desencadenar una sublectura de búfer en el método String#unpack. Esto resulta en una gran divulgación de información controlada. A integer underflow was found in the way String#unpack decodes the unpacking format. An attacker, able to control the unpack format, could use this flaw to disclose arbitrary parts of the application's memory. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103693 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00024.html& • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-134: Use of Externally-Controlled Format String •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, the UNIXServer.open and UNIXSocket.open methods are not checked for null characters. It may be connected to an unintended socket. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, los métodos UNIXServer.open y UNIXSocket.open no se comprueban en busca de caracteres null. Podría estar relacionado con un socket no planeado. It was found that the UNIXSocket::open and UNIXServer::open ruby methods did not handle the NULL byte properly. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103767 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00024.html& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte) •

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, the Dir.open, Dir.new, Dir.entries and Dir.empty? methods do not check NULL characters. When using the corresponding method, unintentional directory traversal may be performed. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, los métodos Dir.open, Dir.new, Dir.entries y Dir.empty? no comprueban los caracteres NULL. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103739 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0542 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata&#x • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

Directory traversal vulnerability in the Dir.mktmpdir method in the tmpdir library in Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1 might allow attackers to create arbitrary directories or files via a .. (dot dot) in the prefix argument. Vulnerabilidad de salto de directorio en el método Dir.mktmpdir en la biblioteca tmpdir en Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, podría permitir que atacantes creen directorios o archivos arbitrarios mediante un .. (punto punto) en el argumento prefix. It was found that the tmpdir and tempfile modules did not sanitize their file name argument. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103686 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00024.html& • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1 allows an HTTP Response Splitting attack. An attacker can inject a crafted key and value into an HTTP response for the HTTP server of WEBrick. Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, permite un ataque de separación de respuesta HTTP. Un atacante puede inyectar una clave y un valor manipulados en una respuesta HTTP para el servidor HTTP de WEBrick. It was found that WEBrick did not sanitize headers sent back to clients, resulting in a response-splitting vulnerability. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103684 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00024.html& • CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •