Page 4 of 31 results (0.020 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 12%CPEs: 50EXPL: 0

In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2c9c35870601b4a44d86ddbf512b38df38285cfa https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7a9c027159fe9e1bbc2cd38a8a2914bff0d5abd9 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=9639817dac8bbbaa64d09efad7464ccc405527c7 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6WZZBKUHQFGSKGNXXKICSRPL7AMVW5M5 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0

BIND 9.16.11 -> 9.16.26, 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 and versions 9.16.11-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 of the BIND Supported Preview Edition. Specifically crafted TCP streams can cause connections to BIND to remain in CLOSE_WAIT status for an indefinite period of time, even after the client has terminated the connection. BIND versiones 9.16.11 posteriores a 9.16.26, versiones 9.17.0 posteriores a 9.18.0 y versiones 9.16.11-S1 posteriores a 9.16.26-S1 de BIND Supported Preview Edition. Los flujos TCP específicamente diseñados pueden causar que las conexiones a BIND permanezcan en estado CLOSE_WAIT durante un período de tiempo indefinido, incluso después de que el cliente haya terminado la conexión A flaw was found in Bind that incorrectly handles certain crafted TCP streams. The vulnerability allows TCP connection slots to be consumed for an indefinite time frame via a specifically crafted TCP stream sent from a client. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2022-0396 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NYD7US4HZRFUGAJ66ZTHFBYVP5N3OQBY https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-25 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220408-0001 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-0396 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064513 • CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 166EXPL: 0

BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.36 9.12.0 -> 9.16.26 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 BIND Supported Preview Editions: 9.11.4-S1 -> 9.11.36-S1 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 Versions of BIND 9 earlier than those shown - back to 9.1.0, including Supported Preview Editions - are also believed to be affected but have not been tested as they are EOL. The cache could become poisoned with incorrect records leading to queries being made to the wrong servers, which might also result in false information being returned to clients. BIND versiones 9.11.0 posteriores a 9.11.36, versiones 9.12.0 posteriores a 9.16.26, versiones 9.17.0 posteriores a 9.18.0, Ediciones Preliminares Soportadas con BIND: versiones .11.4-S1 posteriores a 9.11.36-S1, versiones 9.16.8-S1 posteriores a 9.16.26-S1, también creemos que las versiones de BIND 9 anteriores a las mostradas - hasta la versión 9.1.0, incluyendo las ediciones preliminares soportadas - también están afectadas pero no han sido probadas ya que son EOL. La caché podría envenenarse con registros incorrectos, conllevando a una realización de consultas a servidores erróneos, lo que también podría resultar en que se devolviera información falsa a clientes A cache poisoning vulnerability was found in BIND when using forwarders. Bogus NS records supplied by the forwarders may be cached and used by name if it needs to recurse for any reason. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2021-25220 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2SXT7247QTKNBQ67MNRGZD23ADXU6E5U https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5VX3I2U3ICOIEI5Y7OYA6CHOLFMNH3YQ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/API7U5E7SX7BAAVFNW366FFJGD6NZZKV https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announc • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0

There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3bf7b73ea7123045b8f972badc67ed6878e6c37f https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=6fc1aaaf303185aa5e483e06bdfae16daa9193a7 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e9e726506cd2a3fd9c0f12daf8cc1fe934c7dddb https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5103 •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

node-fetch is vulnerable to Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor node-fetch es vulnerable a una Exposición de Información Confidencial a un Actor no Autorizado A flaw was found in node-fetch. When following a redirect to a third-party domain, node-fetch was forwarding sensitive headers such as "Authorization," "WWW-Authenticate," and "Cookie" to potentially untrusted targets. This flaw leads to the exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/commit/36e47e8a6406185921e4985dcbeff140d73eaa10 https://huntr.dev/bounties/d26ab655-38d6-48b3-be15-f9ad6b6ae6f7 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00007.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-0235 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044591 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') •