CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 22EXPL: 0CVE-2013-6075
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-6075
The compare_dn function in utils/identification.c in strongSwan 4.3.3 through 5.1.1 allows (1) remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read, NULL pointer dereference, and daemon crash) or (2) remote authenticated users to impersonate arbitrary users and bypass access restrictions via a crafted ID_DER_ASN1_DN ID, related to an "insufficient length check" during identity comparison. La función compare_dn en utils/identification.c en strongSwan 4.3.3 hasta la versión 5.1.1 permite (1) a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (leer fuera de los límites, referencia a un puntero NULL, y la caída del demonio) o (2) usuarios remotos autenticados suplantar a usuarios arbitrarios y evitar las restricciones de acceso a través de un ID ID_DER_ASN1_DN elaborado, relacionado con un "insufficient length check" en comparación de identidad. • http://download.strongswan.org/security/CVE-2013-6075/strongswan-4.3.3-5.1.0_id_dn_match.patch http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2789 http://www.strongswan.org/blog/2013/11/01/strongswan-denial-of-service-vulnerability-%28cve-2013-6075%29.html • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 4%CPEs: 9EXPL: 1CVE-2013-5018
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-5018
The is_asn1 function in strongSwan 4.1.11 through 5.0.4 does not properly validate the return value of the asn1_length function, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a (1) XAuth username, (2) EAP identity, or (3) PEM encoded file that starts with a 0x04, 0x30, or 0x31 character followed by an ASN.1 length value that triggers an integer overflow. La función is_asn1 en strongSwan v4.1.11 hasta v5.0.4 no valida correctamente el valor de retorno de la función asn1_length, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria) a través de (1) nombre de usuario XAuth, (2) identidad EAP, o (3) la codificación PEM de un fichero que comienza con los caracteres "0x04, 0x30, o 0x31" seguidos por un valor de tamaño ASN.1 que dispara un desbordamiento de enteros. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-08/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-08/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-08/msg00050.html http://secunia.com/advisories/54315 http://secunia.com/advisories/54524 http://strongswan.org/blog/2013/08/01/strongswan-5.1.0-released.html http://strongswan.org/blog/2013/08/01/strongswan-denial-of-service-vulnerability-%28cve-2013-5018%29.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/61564 https& • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 5%CPEs: 96EXPL: 0CVE-2013-2054
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-2054
Buffer overflow in the atodn function in strongSwan 2.0.0 through 4.3.4, when Opportunistic Encryption is enabled and an RSA key is being used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pluto IKE daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted DNS TXT records. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-2053 and CVE-2013-2054. Desbordamiento de buffer en la función atodn en strongSwan v2.0.0 hasta v4.3.4, cuando está activada "Opportunistic Encryption" y se usa una clave RSA, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caida del demonio IKE) y posiblemente ejecutar código a través de registros DNS TXT. NOTA: esta podría ser la misma vulnerabilidad que CVE-2013-2053 y CVE-2013-2054. • http://download.strongswan.org/security/CVE-2013-2054/CVE-2013-2054.txt http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/59837 https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan-announce/2013/000003.html • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0CVE-2012-2388
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-2388
The GMP Plugin in strongSwan 4.2.0 through 4.6.3 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a (1) empty or (2) zeroed RSA signature, aka "RSA signature verification vulnerability." El GMP Plugin en strongSwan v4.2.0 hasta v4.6.3 permite a atacantes remotos evitar la autenticación a través de una firma RSA (1) vacía o (2) completada con ceros, también conocido como "Vulnerabilidad de verficación de firma RSA". • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-06/msg00002.html http://osvdb.org/82587 http://secunia.com/advisories/49315 http://secunia.com/advisories/49336 http://secunia.com/advisories/49370 http://secunia.com/advisories/55051 http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2483 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53752 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027110 http://www.strongswan.org/blog/2012/05/31/strongswan-4.6.4-released-%28cve-2012-2388%29.html https:/ • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 85%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2010-2628
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-2628
The IKE daemon in strongSwan 4.3.x before 4.3.7 and 4.4.x before 4.4.1 does not properly check the return values of snprintf calls, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted (1) certificate or (2) identity data that triggers buffer overflows. El demonio IKE en strongSwan v4.3.x anterior a v4.3.7 y v4.4.x anterior a v4.4.1 no comprueba adecuadamente el valor devuelto de la llamada snprintf, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección a través de (1) certificado o (2) datos de identidad manipulados, que desencadenan un debordamiento de búfer • http://download.strongswan.org/patches/08_snprintf_patch/strongswan-4.3.3_snprintf.patch http://download.strongswan.org/patches/08_snprintf_patch/strongswan-4.3.4_snprintf.patch http://download.strongswan.org/patches/08_snprintf_patch/strongswan-4.3.5_snprintf.patch http://download.strongswan.org/patches/08_snprintf_patch/strongswan-4.3.6_snprintf.patch http://download.strongswan.org/patches/08_snprintf_patch/strongswan-4.4.0_snprintf.patch http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2010-08/msg00026.h • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •