CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 1CVE-2020-5397 – CSRF Attack via CORS Preflight Requests with Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-5397
Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack. Spring Framework, versiones 5.2.x anteriores a 5.2.3 son vulnerables a los ataques de tipo CSRF por medio de peticiones de verificación previa CORS que van dirigidas a los endpoints Spring MVC (módulo spring-webmvc) o Spring WebFlux (módulo spring-webflux). • https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2020-5397 https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 8.0EPSS: 62%CPEs: 63EXPL: 1CVE-2020-5398 – RFD Attack via "Content-Disposition" Header Sourced from Request Input by Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux Application
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-5398
In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. En Spring Framework, versiones 5.2.x anteriores a 5.2.3, versiones 5.1.x anteriores a 5.1.13 y versiones 5.0.x anteriores a 5.0.16, una aplicación es vulnerable a un ataque de tipo reflected file download (RFD) cuando se establece un encabezado "Content-Disposition" en la respuesta donde el atributo filename es derivado de la entrada suministrada por el usuario. A flaw was found in springframework in versions prior to 5.0.16, 5.1.13, and 5.2.3. A reflected file download (RFD) attack is possible when a "Content-Disposition" header is set in response to where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. • https://github.com/motikan2010/CVE-2020-5398 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r028977b9b9d44a89823639aa3296fb0f0cfdd76b4450df89d3c4fbbf%40%3Cissues.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0f2d0ae1bad2edb3d4a863d77f3097b5e88cfbdae7b809f4f42d6aad%40%3Cissues.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0f3530f7cb510036e497532ffc4e0bd0b882940448cf4e233994b08b%40%3Ccommits.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1accbd4f31ad2f40e1661d70a4510a584eb3efd1e32e8660ccf46676%40%3Ccommits.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org&#x • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2CVE-2016-1000027
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1000027
Pivotal Spring Framework through 5.3.16 suffers from a potential remote code execution (RCE) issue if used for Java deserialization of untrusted data. Depending on how the library is implemented within a product, this issue may or not occur, and authentication may be required. NOTE: the vendor's position is that untrusted data is not an intended use case. The product's behavior will not be changed because some users rely on deserialization of trusted data. Pivotal Spring Framework hasta la versión 5.3.16 sufre un potencial problema de ejecución remota de código (RCE) si se utiliza para la deserialización en Java de datos no confiables. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-1000027 https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/24434#issuecomment-579669626 https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/24434#issuecomment-582313417 https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/24434#issuecomment-744519525 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/distributedweaknessfiling/cvelist/master/2016/1000xxx/CVE-2016-1000027.json https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-1000027 https://security.netapp.com/advi • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15801 – Authorization Bypass During JWT Issuer Validation with spring-security
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15801
Spring Security versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability during JWT issuer validation. In order to be impacted, the same private key for an honest issuer and a malicious user must be used when signing JWTs. In that case, a malicious user could fashion signed JWTs with the malicious issuer URL that may be granted for the honest issuer. Spring Security, en versiones 5.1.x anteriores a la 5.1.2 contiene una vulnerabilidad de omisión de autenticación durante la validación del emisor JWT. Para que sufra un impacto, debe emplearse la misma clave privada para un emisor honesto y un usuario malicioso al firmar JWT. • https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-15801 • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 114EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15756 – DoS Attack via Range Requests
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15756
Spring Framework, version 5.1, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.10, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.20, and older unsupported versions on the 4.2.x branch provide support for range requests when serving static resources through the ResourceHttpRequestHandler, or starting in 5.0 when an annotated controller returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. A malicious user (or attacker) can add a range header with a high number of ranges, or with wide ranges that overlap, or both, for a denial of service attack. This vulnerability affects applications that depend on either spring-webmvc or spring-webflux. Such applications must also have a registration for serving static resources (e.g. JS, CSS, images, and others), or have an annotated controller that returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105703 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/339fd112517e4873695b5115b96acdddbfc8f83b10598528d37c7d12%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77886fec378ee6064debb1efb6b464a4a0173b2ff0d151ed86d3a228%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7b156ee50ba3ecce87b33c06bf7a749d84ffee55e69bfb5eca88fcc3%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8a1fe70534fc52ff5c9db5ac29c55657f802cbefd7e9d9850c7052bd%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •