Page 40 of 294 results (0.019 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

ssl_engine_kernel.c in mod_ssl before 2.8.24, when using "SSLVerifyClient optional" in the global virtual host configuration, does not properly enforce "SSLVerifyClient require" in a per-location context, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. • http://lists.trustix.org/pipermail/tsl-announce/2005-October/000354.html http://marc.info/?l=apache-modssl&m=112569517603897&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=112604765028607&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=112870296926652&w=2 http://people.apache.org/~jorton/CAN-2005-2700.diff http://secunia.com/advisories/16700 http://secunia.com/advisories/16705 http://secunia.com/advisories/16714 http://secunia.com/advisories/16743 http://secunia.com/advisories/16746 http:&# •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 92%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

The byte-range filter in Apache 2.0 before 2.0.54 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an HTTP header with a large Range field. • ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20060101-01-U http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962 http://lists.trustix.org/pipermail/tsl-announce/2005-October/000354.html http://secunia.com/advisories/16559 http://secunia.com/advisories/16705 http://secunia.com/advisories/16714 http://secunia.com/advisories/16743 http://secunia.com/advisories/16746 http://secunia.com/advisories/16753 http://secunia.com/advisories/16754 http://secunia.com/advisories/ •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

Off-by-one error in the mod_ssl Certificate Revocation List (CRL) verification callback in Apache, when configured to use a CRL, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (child process crash) via a CRL that causes a buffer overflow of one null byte. Error de fuera-por-uno en la retrollamda de verificación de Lista de Revocación de Certificados (CRL) de mod_ssl para Apache, cuando se configura para usar un CRL, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída de proceso hijo) mediante una CRL que causa un desbordamiento de búfer de un byte nule. • http://lists.trustix.org/pipermail/tsl-announce/2005-October/000354.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-582.html http://secunia.com/advisories/19072 http://secunia.com/advisories/19185 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/604 http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102198-1 http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2006-081.htm http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-805 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:129 http:/& • CWE-193: Off-by-one Error •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 96%CPEs: 3EXPL: 2

The Apache HTTP server before 1.3.34, and 2.0.x before 2.0.55, when acting as an HTTP proxy, allows remote attackers to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks via an HTTP request with both a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header and a Content-Length header, which causes Apache to incorrectly handle and forward the body of the request in a way that causes the receiving server to process it as a separate HTTP request, aka "HTTP Request Smuggling." • http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302847 http://lists.trustix.org/pipermail/tsl-announce/2005-October/000354.html http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-announce&m=112931556417329&w=3 http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2005/Jun/0025.html http://secunia.com/advisories/14530 http://secunia.com/advisories/17319 http://secunia.com/advisories/17487 http://secunia.com/advisories/17813 http://secunia.com/advisories/19072 http://secunia.com/advisories/19073 http://secunia. • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 5

Buffer overflow in htdigest in Apache 2.0.52 may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long realm argument. NOTE: since htdigest is normally only locally accessible and not setuid or setgid, there are few attack vectors which would lead to an escalation of privileges, unless htdigest is executed from a CGI program. Therefore this may not be a vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/25625 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/25624 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005//Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005/Aug/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005/May/msg00001.html http://www.lucaercoli.it/advs/htdigest.txt http://www.osvdb.org/12848 http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5EP061FEKC.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13537 •