CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15909 – ghostscript: shading_param incomplete type checking (699660)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15909
In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, a type confusion using the .shfill operator could be used by attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. En Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 antes del 24/08/2018, los atacantes podrían emplear una confusión de tipos usando el operador .shfill para proporcionar archivos PostScript manipulados para provocar el cierre inesperado del intérprete o ejecutar código. It was discovered that the ghostscript .shfill operator did not properly validate certain types. An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=0b6cd1918e1ec4ffd087400a754a845180a4522b http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=e01e77a36cbb2e0277bc3a63852244bec41be0f6 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105178 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3650 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44101 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K24803507?utm • CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15908 – ghostscript: .tempfile file permission issues (699657)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15908
In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-23, attackers are able to supply malicious PostScript files to bypass .tempfile restrictions and write files. En Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 antes del 23/08/2018, los atacantes pueden proporcionar archivos PostScript maliciosos para omitir las restricciones .tempfile y escribir en archivos. It was discovered that the ghostscript .tempfile function did not properly handle file permissions. An attacker could possibly exploit this to exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and delete files or disclose their content via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=0d3901189f245232f0161addf215d7268c4d05a3 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3650 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/332928 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-15908 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619756 •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15910 – ghostscript: LockDistillerParams type confusion (699656)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15910
In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the LockDistillerParams parameter to crash the interpreter or execute code. En Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.24, los atacantes que puedan proporcionar archivos PostScript manipulados podrían emplear una confusión de tipos en el parámetro LockDistillerParams para provocar el cierre inesperado del intérprete o ejecutar código. It was discovered that the type of the LockDistillerParams parameter is not properly verified. An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c3476dde7743761a4e1d39a631716199b696b880 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105122 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2918 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699656 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44101 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K22141757?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium= • CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2011-2767 – mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-2767
mod_perl 2.0 through 2.0.10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Perl code by placing it in a user-owned .htaccess file, because (contrary to the documentation) there is no configuration option that permits Perl code for the administrator's control of HTTP request processing without also permitting unprivileged users to run Perl code in the context of the user account that runs Apache HTTP Server processes. mod_perl 2.0 hasta la versión 2.0.10 permite que los atacantes ejecuten código Perl colocándolo en un archivo .htaccess propiedad del usuario, debido a que (al contrario de lo que pone en la documentación) no hay una opción de configuración que permita el código Perl para el control de administrador del procesamiento de peticiones HTTP sin permitir también que usuarios sin privilegios ejecuten código Perl en el contexto de la cuenta de usuario que ejecuta los procesos Apache HTTP Server. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00063.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00065.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105195 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2737 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2825 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2826 https://bugs.debian.org/644169 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c8ebe8aad147a3ad2e7b0e8b2da45263171ab5d0fc7f8c100feaa94d%40%3Cmodperl-cvs.perl.apache.org%3E https://li • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10846 – gnutls: "Just in Time" PRIME + PROBE cache-based side channel attack can lead to plaintext recovery
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10846
A cache-based side channel in GnuTLS implementation that leads to plain text recovery in cross-VM attack setting was found. An attacker could use a combination of "Just in Time" Prime+probe attack in combination with Lucky-13 attack to recover plain text using crafted packets. Se ha detectado un canal lateral basado en memoria caché en la implementación GnuTLS que conduce a un ataque de recuperación de texto plano a través de una máquina virtual. Un atacante podría utilizar una combinación de un ataque "Just in Time" Prime+probe con un ataque Lucky-13 para recuperar texto plano usando paquetes manipulados. A cache-based side channel attack was found in the way GnuTLS implements CBC-mode cipher suites. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105138 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3050 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10846 https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/747 https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/657 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00022.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ILMOWPKMTZAIMK5F32TUMO34XCABUCFJ https://lists.fedor • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •