CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 62EXPL: 0CVE-2015-8126 – libpng: Buffer overflow vulnerabilities in png_get_PLTE/png_set_PLTE functions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8126
Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) png_set_PLTE and (2) png_get_PLTE functions in libpng before 1.0.64, 1.1.x and 1.2.x before 1.2.54, 1.3.x and 1.4.x before 1.4.17, 1.5.x before 1.5.24, and 1.6.x before 1.6.19 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a small bit-depth value in an IHDR (aka image header) chunk in a PNG image. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer en las funciones (1) png_set_PLTE y (2) png_get_PLTE en libpng en versiones anteriores a 1.0.64, 1.1.x y 1.2.x en versiones anteriores a 1.2.54, 1.3.x y 1.4.x en versiones anteriores a 1.4.17, 1.5.x en versiones anteriores a 1.5.24 y 1.6.x en versiones anteriores a 1.6.19 permiten a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de un valor bit-depth pequeño en un fragmento IHDR (también conocido como image header) en una imagen PNG. It was discovered that the png_get_PLTE() and png_set_PLTE() functions of libpng did not correctly calculate the maximum palette sizes for bit depths of less than 8. In case an application tried to use these functions in combination with properly calculated palette sizes, this could lead to a buffer overflow or out-of-bounds reads. An attacker could exploit this to cause a crash or potentially execute arbitrary code by tricking an unsuspecting user into processing a specially crafted PNG image. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/03/stable-channel-update.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172324.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172620.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172647.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172663.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 64EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4902 – Oracle Java SE Integrity Check Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4902
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85, and 8u60 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Deployment. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85 y 8u60 permite a atacantes remotos afectar a la integridad a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con Deployment. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE allows remote attackers to affect integrity via Unknown vectors related to deployment. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-11/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 1CVE-2012-6685 – rubygem-nokogiri: XML eXternal Entity (XXE) flaw
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-6685
Nokogiri before 1.5.4 is vulnerable to XXE attacks Nokogiri versiones anteriores a 1.5.4, es vulnerable a ataques de tipo XXE. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178970 https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/693 https://nokogiri.org/CHANGELOG.html#154-2012-06-12 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-6685 • CWE-611: Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference CWE-776: Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs ('XML Entity Expansion') •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1931 – JDK: plain text data stored in memory dumps
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1931
IBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 before SR1 FP10, 7 R1 before SR3 FP10, 7 before SR9 FP10, 6 R1 before SR8 FP7, 6 before SR16 FP7, and 5.0 before SR16 FP13 stores plaintext information in memory dumps, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file. IBM Java Security Components en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 versiones anteriores a SR1 FP10, 7 R1 anteriores a SR3 FP10, 7 anteriores a SR9 FP10, 6 R1 anteriores a SR8 FP7, 6 anteriores a SR16 FP7, y 5.0 anteriores a SR16 FP13, almacena información de texto plano en volcados de memoria, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener información confidencial al leer un archivo • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00051.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-09/msg00014.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1485.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1486.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1488.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1544.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1604.html http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IV75182 http://www-01.ibm&# • CWE-312: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 160EXPL: 0CVE-2015-2808 – SSL/TLS: "Invariance Weakness" vulnerability in RC4 stream cipher
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-2808
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. El algoritmo RC4, utilizado en el protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL, no combina correctamente los datos de estados con los datos de claves durante la fase de inicialización, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro contra los bytes iniciales de un flujo mediante la captura de trafico de la red que ocasionalmente depende de claves afectadas por la debilidad de la invariabilidad (Invariance Weakness), y posteriormente utilizar un acercamiento de fuerza bruta que involucra valores LSB, también conocido como el problema de 'Bar Mitzvah'. • http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •